Advertisement

Challenges Experienced in Establishing Clinical Indication Based Diagnostic Reference Levels: Pilot Study

Published:November 16, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.110046

      Abstract

      Purpose

      The objective of this study is to establish clinical-indication based Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs) for the Computed Tomography (CT) examinations of Head, Abdomen & Pelvis+Contrast, and Kidney Ureter Bladder (KUB). Further, is to investigate the cases that register high-end doses to enable dose optimization.

      Material and methods

      Dose length product total (tDLPs) and scan acquisition parameters of a total of 715 patients who underwent CT Head, CT Abdomen & Pelvis+Contrast, and CT KUB studies were obtained and retrospectively examined. An electronic patient radiation dose monitoring system DOSE-TQM linked with the existing PACS was used to randomly generate patient dose information. Patient’s demographics, clinical indications and scan acquisitions were also collected. ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison tests were used to check statistical differences between tDLPs per clinical indications.

      Results

      The data exhibited 341 CT Head, 109 patients for CT Abdomen & Pelvis+Contrast, and 265 CT KUB examinations. The DRLs proposed using total DLP (mGy.cm) for clinical indications; abdominal pain for both CT Abdomen & Pelvis+Contrast and CT KUB (441 and 311 mGy.cm, respectively), appendicitis /acute appendicitis (484 mGy.cm), head trauma (544 mGy.cm), stroke (544 mGy.cm) and renal colic (308 mGy.cm). These values were concluded to be below or in close proximity with the total DLP based indication reported internationally. Patient weight is a significant dose contributor.

      Conclusion

      DLP differences exists not only between the same anatomical based CT studies but also across the same clinical indications. DLPs based on clinical indications provide a tool for CT dose optimisation that is better adapted to clinical practices and to the variability of patient’s morphology.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to European Journal of Radiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Tsapaki V.
        • Damilakis J.
        • Paulo G.
        • Schegerer A.A.
        • Repussard J.
        • Jaschke W.
        • Frija G.
        CT diagnostic reference levels based on clinical indications: results of a large-scale European survey.
        European Radiology. 2021; 31: 4459-4469https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07652-5
        • Lell M.
        • Wildberger J.
        • Alkadhi H.
        • Damilakis J.
        • Kachelriess M.
        Evolution in Computed Tomography.
        Investigative Radiology. 2015; 50: 629-644https://doi.org/10.1097/rli.0000000000000172
        • Järvinen H.
        • Seuri R.
        • Kortesniemi M.
        • Lajunen A.
        • Hallinen E.
        • Savikurki-Heikkilä P.
        • Laarne P.
        • Perhomaa M.
        • Tyrväinen E.
        Indication-based national diagnostic reference levels for paediatric CT: a new approach with proposed values.
        Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2015; 165: 86-90https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncv044
        • Paulo, G., Damilakis, J., Tsapaki, V., Schegerer, A.A., Repussard, J., Jaschker, W., Frija, G. and European Society of Radiology
        Diagnostic reference levels based on clinical indications in computed tomogrphy: a literature review.
        Insights nto Imaging. 2020; 11: 96https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00899-y
        • Geryes B.H.
        • Hornbeck A.
        • Jarrige V.
        • Pierrat N.
        • Le Pointe H.D.
        • Dreuil S.
        Patient dose evaluation in computed tomography: A French national study based on clinical indications.
        Physica Medica. 2019; 61: 19-27https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.04.004
        • Damilakis J.
        • Frija G.
        • Jaschke G.
        • Paulo J.
        • Repussard A.
        • Schegerer A.
        • Tsapaki V.
        • Clark J.
        • Hierath M.
        European study on clinical diagnostic reference levels for X-ray medical imaging.
        European Commission. Radiation Protection Report. 2021; N0: 195
      1. AlSuwaidi, J., AlMazrouei, N., Pottybindu, S., Al Blooshi, A., Kuriakose, V., & Mathew, D. (2015). Patient dose monitoring in Dubai in radiography and interventional procedures 2015. Retrieved 7 February 2021, from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0146645315575875

        • Dalah E.
        • Waleed Al-Dhubhani H.
        • Elmehdi H.
        • Obaideen A.
        • Weis M.
        • Adas O.
        University Hospital in Sharjah Diagnostic Reference Levels for Multi-detector CT Examinations.
        in: 2019 Advances In Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences (ASET). 2019https://doi.org/10.1109/icaset.2019.8714246
        • Abuzaid M.
        • Elshami W.
        • Tekin H.
        • Ghonim H.
        • Shawki M.
        • Salama D.
        Computed tomography radiation doses for common computed tomography examinations: a nationwide dose survey in United Arab Emirates. Insights into.
        Imaging. 2020; 11https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00891-6
      2. Joseph Zira, D., Haruna Yahaya, T., Umar, M., Nkubli B, F., Chukwuemeka, N., & Sidi, M. et al. (2020). Clinical indication-based diagnostic reference levels for paediatric head computed tomography examinations in Kano Metropolis, Northwestern Nigeria. Radiography. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2020.11.021

      3. Abdulkadir, M. (2015). Determination of computed tomography diagnostic reference levels in north-central Nigeria. Retrieved 7 February 2021, from http://www.akamaiuniversity.us/PJST17_2_341.pdf

      4. Smith-Bindman, R., Wang, Y., Chu, P., Chung, R., Einstein, AJ., Calcombe, J., Cocker, M., Das, M., Delmman, BN., Flynn, M., et al. 2019. International variation in radiation dose for computed tomography examinations: prospective cohort study. BMJ 364:k4931. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k4931

      5. Qaelum NV. Dose Patient Radiation Dose Monitoring System User Manual 19.02. :1-135.

        • Roch P.
        • Célier D.
        • Dessaud C.
        • Etard C.
        • Rehani M.M.
        Long-term experience and analysis of data on diagnostic reference levels: the good, the bad, and the ugly.
        Eur Radiol. 2020; 30: 1127-1136https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06422-2
        • Yu L.
        • Liu X.
        • Leng S.
        • Kofler J.M.
        • Ramirez-Giraldo J.C.
        • Qu M.
        • Christner J.
        • Fletcher J.G.
        • McCollough C.H.
        Radiation dose reduction in computed tomography: techniques and future perspective.
        Imaging Med. 2009; 1: 65-84
        • Habibzadeh M.A.
        • et al.
        Impact of miscentering on patient dose and image noise in X-ray CT imaging: phantom and clinical studies.
        Phys. Med. 2012; 28: 191-199
        • Mayo-Smith
        • et al.
        How I do it: managing radiation dose in CT.
        Radiology. 2014; 273: 657-672
        • AlNaemi H.
        • Tsapaki V.
        • Omar A.J.
        • AlKuwari M.
        • AlObadli A.
        • Alkhazzam S.
        • Aly A.
        • Kharita M.H.
        Towards establishment of diagnostic reference levels based on clinical indication in the state of Qatar.
        European Journal of Radiology Open. 2020; 7: 100282https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2020.100282
        • Public Health England
        National Diagnostic Reference Levels (NDRLs).
        vol 11 Available from. 2016
        • STUK
        Reference levels for patient radiation exposure in computed tomography examinations of adults.
        Available via. 2013;
      6. van der Molen AJ, Schilham A, Stoop P, Prokop M, Geleijns J (2013) Anational survey on radiation dose in CT in The Netherlands. Insights Imaging. 4(3):383–390 Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13244-013-0253-9

      7. MERU 2017. National survey on population dose from computed tomography 2017, Dublin

        • Widmark A.
        Diagnostic reference level (DRL) in Norway 2017.
        (Available from:)
      8. SRPA 2019. Diagnostic Reference Levels in the Swedish legislation. Available from: https://www.stralsakerhetsmyndigheten.se/en/

      9. Vano E et al. 2019. Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in medical imaging. ICRP publication 135 (2017). Summary updated February 1, 2019.