European Journal of Radiology
Volume 81, Issue 2 , Pages 214-217 , February 2012

MRI morphological classification of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) correlating with different biological behavior

  • Haiquan Liu

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Cancer center, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
    • Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Department of Radiology, Cancer Hospital, Fudan University, 270 Dong-An Road, Shanghai 200032, China. Fax: +86 21 64433384.
  • ,
  • Weijun Peng

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Cancer center, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
    • Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Department of Radiology, Cancer Hospital, Fudan University, 270 Dong-An Road, Shanghai 200032, China. Fax: +86 21 64433384.

Received 20 October 2010 ,Accepted 22 December 2010.

References 

  1. Esserman LJ, Kumar AS, Herrera AF, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging captures the biology of ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(28):4603–4610
  2. Adamovich TL, Simmons RM. Ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion. Am J Surg. 2003;186(2):112–116
  3. Ernster VL, Ballard-Barbash R, Barlow WE, et al. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94(20):54–1546
  4. Leonard GD, Swain SM. Ductal carcinoma in situ, complexities and challenges. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96(12):906–920
  5. Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Bieling HB, et al. MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study. Lancet. 2007;370(9586):485–492
  6. Erbas B, Provenzan E, Armes J, Gertig D. The natural history of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a review. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006;97(2):135–144
  7. van der Velden APS, Schlooz-Vries MS, Boetes C, Wobbes T. Magnetic resonance imaging of ductal carcinoma in situ: what is its clinical application? A review. Am J Surg. 2009;198(2):262–269
  8. American College of Radiology . Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). 4th ed.. Reston Va: American College of Radiology; 2003;
  9. Rosen EL, Smith Foley SA, DeMartini WB, Eby PR, Peacock S, Lehman CD. BI-RADS MRI enhancement characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ. Breast J. 2007;13(6):545–550
  10. Jansen SA, Newstead GM, Abe H, Shimauchi A, Schmidt RA, Karczmar GS. Pure ductal carcinoma in situ: kinetic and morphologic MR characteristics compared with mammographic appearance and nuclear grade. Radiology. 2007;245(3):684–691
  11. Van Goethem M, Schelfout K, Kersschot E, et al. Comparison of MRI features of different grades of DCIS and invasive carcinoma of the breast. JBR-BTR. 2005;88(5):32–225
  12. Neubauer H, Li MX, Kuehne-Heid R, Schneider A, Kaiser WA. High grade and non-high grade ductal carcinoma in situ on dynamic MR mammography: characteristic findings for signal increase and morphological pattern of enhancement. Br J Radiol. 2003;76(901):3–12
  13. Facius M, Renz DM, Neubauer H, et al. Characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ in magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Imaging. 2007;31(6):394–400
  14. Jansen SA, Newstead GM, Abe H, Shimauchi A, Schmidt RA, Karczmar GS. Pure ductal carcinoma in situ: kinetic and morphologic MR characteristics compared with mammographic appearance and nuclear grade. Radiology. 2007;245(3):91–684
  15. Ikeda DM, Hylton NM, Kinkel K, et al. Development, standardization, and testing of a lexicon for reporting contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging studies. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;13(6):95–889
  16. Viehweg P, Lampe D, Buchmann J, Heywang-Kobrunner SH. In situ and minimally invasive breast cancer: morphologic and kinetic features on contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Magma. 2000;11(3):37–129
  17. Chen JH, Baek HM, Nalcioglu O, Su MY. Estrogen receptor and breast MR imaging features: a correlation study. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;27(4):825–833
  18. Padmore RF, Fowble B, Hoffman J, Rosser C, Hanlon A, Patchefsky AS. Microinvasive breast carcinoma—clinicopathologic analysis of a single institution experience. Cancer. 2000;88(6):1403–1409
  19. Vieira CC, Mercado CL, Cangiarella JF, Moy L, Toth HK, Guth AA. Microinvasive ductal carcinoma in situ: clinical presentation, imaging features, pathologic findings, and outcome. Eur J Radiol. 2010;73(1):102–107

PII: S0720-048X(11)00033-7

doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.12.084

European Journal of Radiology
Volume 81, Issue 2 , Pages 214-217 , February 2012