European Journal of Radiology
Volume 72, Issue 2 , Pages 218-225, November 2009

Computer-aided detection (CAD) of lung nodules and small tumours on chest radiographs

  • D.W. De Boo

      Affiliations

    • Academic Medical Center (AMC), Dept of Radiology, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
  • ,
  • M. Prokop

      Affiliations

    • University Medical Center (UMC) Utrecht, Dept. of Radiology, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, Netherlands
  • ,
  • M. Uffmann

      Affiliations

    • University Hospital Vienna (AKH) Vienna, Dept. of Radiology, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
  • ,
  • B. van Ginneken

      Affiliations

    • University Medical Center (UMC) Utrecht, Image Science Center, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, Netherlands
  • ,
  • C.M. Schaefer-Prokop

      Affiliations

    • Academic Medical Center (AMC), Dept of Radiology, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
    • Meander Medical Center, Dept of Radiology, Utrechtseweg 160, 3800 BM Amersfoort, Netherlands

Received 7 May 2009; accepted 7 May 2009.

Abstract 

Detection of focal pulmonary lesions is limited by quantum and anatomic noise and highly influenced by variable perception capacity of the reader. Multiple studies have proven that lesions – missed at time of primary interpretation – were visible on the chest radiographs in retrospect. Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) schemes do not alter the anatomic noise but aim at decreasing the intrinsic limitations and variations of human perception by alerting the reader to suspicious areas in a chest radiograph when used as a ‘second reader’.

Multiple studies have shown that the detection performance can be improved using CAD especially for less experienced readers at a variable amount of decreased specificity. There seem to be a substantial learning process for both, experienced and inexperienced readers, to be able to optimally differentiate between false positive and true positive lesions and to build up sufficient trust in the capabilities of these systems to be able to use them at their full advantage. Studies so far focussed on stand-alone performance of the CAD schemes to reveal the magnitude of potential impact or on retrospective evaluation of CAD as a second reader for selected study groups. Further research is needed to assess the performance of these systems in clinical routine and to determine the trade-off between performance increase in terms of increased sensitivity and decreased inter-reader variability and loss of specificity and secondary indicated follow-up examinations for further diagnostic workup.

Keywords: CAD, Lung cancer, Pulmonary metastases, Perception

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0720-048X(09)00352-0

doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.05.062

European Journal of Radiology
Volume 72, Issue 2 , Pages 218-225, November 2009