European Journal of Radiology
Volume 75, Issue 2 , Pages 159-165, August 2010

What is the best contrast injection protocol for 64-row multi-detector cardiac computed tomography?

Department of Radiology, Cardiovascular Institute and Fuwai Hospital, Peking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, 167 Beilishi Road, Beijing, China

Received 12 October 2008; received in revised form 13 April 2009; accepted 15 April 2009.

Abstract 

Objective

To determine the optimal contrast injection protocol for 64-MDCT coronary angiography.

Materials and methods

One hundred and fifty consecutive patients scheduled to undergo retrospectively electrocardiographically gated 64-MDCT. Each 30 patients were assigned to use a different contrast protocol: group 1: uniphasic protocol (contrast injection without saline flush); group 2: biphasic protocol (contrast injection with saline flush); group 3A, 3B and 3C: triphasic protocol (contrast media+different saline diluted contrast media+saline flush). Image quality scores and artifacts were compared and evaluated on both transaxial and three-dimensional coronary artery images among each contrast protocol.

Results

Among the triphasic protocol groups, group 3A (30%:70% contrast media–saline mixture was used in second phase) used the least contrast media and had the least frequency of streak artifacts, but there were no significant differences in coronary artery attenuation, image quality, visualization right and left heart structures. Among the uniphasic protocol group (group 1), biphasic protocol group (group 2) and triphasic protocol subgroup (group 3A), there were no significant differences in image quality scores of coronary artery (P=0.18); uniphasic protocol group had the highest frequency of streak artifacts (20 cases) (P<0.05) and had the most amount contrast media (67.0±5.3ml); biphasic protocol group had the least amount of contrast media (59.9±4.9ml) (P<0.05) and had the highest attenuation of left main coronary artery and right coronary artery (P<0.01), but had the least amount of clear visualization right heart structure (6 cases); triphasic protocol group (group 3A) had the most amount of clear visualization right heart structures (29 cases) were the most among the three groups (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Biphasic protocol are superior to the traditional uniphasic protocols for using the least total contrast media, having the least Streak artifacts and without image quality degradation. However, it is also important to visualize the right atrium and ventricle, so triphasic protocol (30%:70% contrast media–saline mixture was used in second phase) should be used for 64-MDCT coronary CT angiography.

Keywords: Computed tomography, Contrast media, CT angiography

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The paper was presented at an RSNA meeting of 2007. It was an original research and granted by the “Eleventh five-year plan” of the Ministry of Science and Technology, China (No.2007BAI05B02).

PII: S0720-048X(09)00235-6

doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.04.035

European Journal of Radiology
Volume 75, Issue 2 , Pages 159-165, August 2010