European Journal of Radiology
Volume 75, Issue 2 , Pages 154-158 , August 2010

Hybrid cardiac SPECT/64-slice CTA-derived LV function parameters: Correlation and reproducibility assessment

  • Sobhi Abadi

      Affiliations

    • Medical Imaging Department, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, M5G2C4 Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 647 2621419.
  • ,
  • Olga R. Brook

      Affiliations

    • Medical Imaging Department, Rambam Health Care Campus, POB 9602, Haifa 31096, Israel
  • ,
  • Shmuel Rispler

      Affiliations

    • Nuclear Medicine Department, Rambam Health Care Campus, POB 9602, Haifa 31096, Israel
  • ,
  • Alex Frenkel

      Affiliations

    • Nuclear Medicine Department, Rambam Health Care Campus, POB 9602, Haifa 31096, Israel
  • ,
  • Ahuva Engel

      Affiliations

    • Medical Imaging Department, Rambam Health Care Campus, POB 9602, Haifa 31096, Israel
  • ,
  • Zohar Keidar

      Affiliations

    • Nuclear Medicine Department, Rambam Health Care Campus, POB 9602, Haifa 31096, Israel

Received 5 March 2009 ,Revised 12 April 2009 ,Accepted 14 April 2009.

References 

  1. White HD, Norris RM, Brown MA, et al. Left ventricular end-systolic volume as the major determination of survival after recovery from myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1987;76:44–51
  2. Bloomer TN, Plein S, Radjenovic A, et al. Cine MRI using steady state free precession in the radial long axis orientation is a fast accurate method for obtaining volumetric data of the left ventricle. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;14:685–692
  3. Sakuma H, Fujita N, Foo TK, et al. Evaluation of left ventricular volume and mass with breathhold cine MR imaging. Radiology. 1993;188:377–380
  4. Pluim BM, Beyerbacht HP, Chin JC, et al. Comparison of echocardiography with magnetic resonance in the assessment of the athlete's heart. Eur Heart J. 1997;18:1505–1513
  5. Atsma DE, Bavelaar-Croon CD, Germano G, et al. Good correlation between gated single photon emission computed myocardial tomography and contrast ventriculography in the assessment of global and regional left ventricular function. Int J Cardiac Imaging. 2000;16:447–453
  6. Germano G, Kavanagh PB, Kavanagh JT, et al. Repeatability of automatic left ventricular cavity volume measurements from myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol. 1998;5:477–483
  7. Sharir T, Germano G, Kavanagh PB, et al. Incremental prognostic value of post-stress left ventricular ejection fraction and volume by gated myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. Circulation. 1999;100:1035–1042
  8. Ehara M, Surmely JF, Kawai M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography for detecting angiographically significant coronary artery stenosis in an unselected consecutive patient population: comparison with conventional invasive angiography. Circ J. 2006;70:564–571
  9. Hamon M, Biondi-Zoccai GG, Malagutti P, et al. Diagnostic performance of multislice spiral computed tomography of coronary arteries as compared with conventional invasive coronary angiography: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:1896–1910
  10. Meijboom WB, Meijs MF, Schuijf JD, Cramer MJ. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52(25):2145–2147
  11. Juergens KU, Grude M, Maintz D, et al. Multi-detector row CT of left ventricular function with dedicated analysis software versus MR imaging: initial experience. Radiology. 2004;230:403–410
  12. Heuschmid M, Küttner A, Schröder S, et al. Left ventricular functional parameters using ECG-gated multidetector spiral CT in comparison with invasive ventriculography. Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2003;175:1349–1354
  13. Yamamuro M, Tadamura E, Kubo S. Cardiac functional analysis with multi-detector row CT and segmental reconstruction algorithm: comparison with echocardiography, SPECT, and MR imaging. Radiology. 2005;234:381–390
  14. Grude M, Juergens KU, Wichter T, et al. Evaluation of global left ventricular myocardial function with electrocardiogram-gated multidetector computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol. 2003;38:653–661
  15. Halliburton SS, Petersilka M, Schvartzman PR, Obuchowski N, White RD. Evaluation of left ventricular dysfunction using multiphasic reconstructions of coronary multi-slice computed tomography data in patients with chronic ischemic heart disease: validation against cine magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Cardiac Imaging. 2003;19:73–83
  16. Lessick J, Mutlak D, Rispler S. Comparison of multidetector computed tomography versus echocardiography for assessing regional left ventricular function. Am J Cardiol. 2005;96(7):1011–1015
  17. Rispler S, Keidar Z, Ghersin E, et al. Integrated single-photon emission computed tomography and computed tomography coronary angiography for the assessment of hemodynamically significant coronary artery lesions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49(10):1059–1067
  18. Schepis T, Gaemperli O, Koepfli P, et al. Comparison of 64-slice CT with gated SPECT for evaluation of left ventricular function. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:1288–1294
  19. Wu YW, Tadamura E, Yamamuro M, et al. Estimation of global and regional cardiac function using 64-slice computed tomography: a comparison study with echocardiography, gated-SPECT and cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Int J Cardiol. 2007;128(1):69–76
  20. Utsunomiya D, Tomiguchi S, Awai K, et al. Multidetector-row CT and quantitative gated SPECT for the assessment of left ventricular function in small hearts: the cardiac physical phantom study using a combined SPECT/CT system. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:1818–1825

PII: S0720-048X(09)00230-7

doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.04.039

European Journal of Radiology
Volume 75, Issue 2 , Pages 154-158 , August 2010