European Journal of Radiology
Volume 75, Issue 2 , Pages 173-177 , August 2010

Effect of cardiac function on aortic peak time and peak enhancement during coronary CT angiography

  • Shuji Sakai

      Affiliations

    • Department of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan
    • Department of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan
    • Tel.: +81 92 642 5695; fax: +81 92 642 5695.
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Department of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan. Tel.: +81 92 642 6727; fax: +81 92 642 6727.
  • ,
  • Hidetake Yabuuchi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan
    • Tel.: +81 92 642 5695; fax: +81 92 642 5695.
  • ,
  • Akiko Chishaki

      Affiliations

    • Department of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan
    • Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan
    • Tel.: +81 92 642 6727; fax: +81 92 642 6727.
    • Tel.: +81 92 642 5360; fax: +81 92 642 5375.
  • ,
  • Takashi Okafuji

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan
    • Tel.: +81 92 642 5695; fax: +81 92 642 5695.
  • ,
  • Yoshio Matsuo

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan
    • Tel.: +81 92 642 5695; fax: +81 92 642 5695.
  • ,
  • Takeshi Kamitani

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan
    • Tel.: +81 92 642 5695; fax: +81 92 642 5695.
  • ,
  • Taro Setoguchi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan
    • Tel.: +81 92 642 5695; fax: +81 92 642 5695.
  • ,
  • Hiroshi Honda

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan
    • Tel.: +81 92 642 5695; fax: +81 92 642 5695.

Received 22 January 2009 ,Revised 7 April 2009 ,Accepted 7 April 2009.

References 

  1. Yamashita Y, Komohara Y, Takahashi M, et al. Abdominal helical CT: evaluation of optimal doses of intravenous contrast material—a prospective randomized study. Radiology. 2000;216:718–723
  2. Itoh S, Ikeda M, Achiwa M, et al. Multiphase contrast-enhanced CT of the liver with a multislice CT scanner. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:1085–1094
  3. Awai K, Hori S. Effect of contrast injection protocol with dose tailored to patient weight and fixed injection duration on aortic and hepatic enhancement at multidetector-row helical CT. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:2155–2160
  4. Cademartiri F, van der Lugt A, Luccichenti G, et al. Parameters affecting bolus geometry in CTA: a review. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2002;26:598–607
  5. Cademartiri F, Nieman K, van der Lugt A, et al. Intravenous contrast material administration at 16-detector row helical CT coronary angiography: test bolus versus bolus-tracking technique. Radiology. 2004;233:817–823
  6. Heiken JP, Brink JA, McClennan BL, et al. Dynamic incremental CT: effect of volume and concentration of contrast material and patient weight on hepatic enhancement. Radiology. 1995;195:353–357
  7. Awai K, Hiraishi K, Hori S. Effect of contrast material injection duration and rate on aortic peak time and peak enhancement at dynamic CT involving injection protocol with dose tailored to patient weight. Radiology. 2004;230:142–150
  8. Bae KT, Heiken JP, Brink JA. Aortic and hepatic contrast medium enhancement at CT. Part II. Effect of reduced cardiac output in a porcine model. Radiology. 1998;207:657–662
  9. Mahnken AH, Klotz E, Hennemuth A, et al. Measurement of cardiac output from a test-bolus injection in multislice computed tomography. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:2498–2504
  10. Husmann L, Alkadhi H, Boehm T, et al. Influence of cardiac hemodynamic parameters on coronary artery opacification with 64-slice computed tomography. Eur Radiol. 2006;28:1–6
  11. Renner LE, Morton MJ, Sakuma GY. Indicator amount, temperature, and intrinsic cardiac output affect thermodilution cardiac output accuracy and reproducibility. Crit Care Med. 1993;21:586–597
  12. Elkayam U, Berkley R, Azen S, et al. Cardiac output by thermodilution technique. Effect of injectate's volume and temperature on accuracy and reproducibility in the critically ill patient. Chest. 1983;84:418–422
  13. Nakajima Y, Yoshimine T, Yoshida H, et al. Computerized tomography angiography of ruptured cerebral aneurysms: factors affecting time to maximum contrast concentration. J Neurosurg. 1998;88:663–669
  14. Pugliese F, Mollet NRA, Runza G, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive 64-slice CT coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:575–582
  15. Sigwart U, Grbic M, Essinger A, et al. Improvement of left ventricular function after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol. 1982;49:651–657
  16. O’Kelly BF, Tubau JF, Knight AA, et al. Measurement of left ventricular contractility using transesophageal echocardiography in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. The Study of Perioperative Ischemia (SPI) Research Group. Am Heart J. 1991;122:1041–1049
  17. Nieman K, Cademartiri F, Lemos PA, et al. Reliable noninvasive coronary angiography with fast submillimeter multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation. 2002;106:2051–2054
  18. Achenbach S, Giesler T, Ropers D, et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses by contrast-enhanced, retrospectively electrocardiographically-gated, multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation. 2001;103:2535–2538
  19. Kim T, Murakami T, Takahashi S, et al. Effects of injection rates of contrast material on arterial phase hepatic CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;171:429–432
  20. Barratt-Boyes BG, Wood EH. Cardiac output and related measurements and pressure values in the right heart and associated vessels, together with an analysis of the hemo-dynamic response to the inhalation of high oxygen mixtures in healthy subjects. J Lab Clin Med. 1958;51:72–90
  21. Hirai N, Imakita S, Tanaka R, et al. Multidetector CT angiography using a dual-head power injector and bolus tracking for the diagnosis of aortic aneurysms at reduced contrast material dosage. Acad Radiol. 2006;13:694–700
  22. Haage P, Schmitz-Rode T, Hübner D, et al. Reduction of contrast material dose and artifacts by a saline flush using a double power injector in helical CT of the thorax. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:1049–1053
  23. Platt JF, Reige KA, Ellis JH. Aortic enhancement during abdominal CT angiography: correlation with test injections, flow rates, and patient demographics. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;172:53–56
  24. Palmieri V, de Simone G, Arnett DK, et al. Relation of various degrees of body mass index in patients with systemic hypertension to left ventricular mass, cardiac output, and peripheral resistance (The Hypertension Genetic Epidemiology Network Study). Am J Cardiol. 2001;88:1163–1168
  25. Silke B, Nelson G, Hussain M, et al. Dose-response effects of cardioselective beta blockade in coronary artery disease. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1984;36:40–46
  26. Mahnken AH, Wildberger JE, Simon J, et al. Detection of coronary calcifications: feasibility of dose reduction with a body weight-adapted examination protocol. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181:533–538
  27. Nelson JC, Kronmal RA, Carr JJ, et al. Measuring coronary calcium on CT images adjusted for attenuation differences. Radiology. 2005;235:403–414

PII: S0720-048X(09)00218-6

doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.04.022

European Journal of Radiology
Volume 75, Issue 2 , Pages 173-177 , August 2010