European Journal of Radiology
Volume 75, Issue 1 , Pages 82-86 , July 2010

CT evaluation of the low severity cervical spine trauma: When is the scout view enough?

  • Nicholas Theocharopoulos

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, P.O. Box 2208, Iraklion 71003, Crete, Greece
    • Department of Natural Sciences, Technological Education Institute of Crete, P.O. Box 140, Iraklion 71004, Crete, Greece
    • ,
  • Georgios Chatzakis

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, P.O. Box 2208, Iraklion 71003, Crete, Greece
    • ,
  • Apostolos Karantanas

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, P.O. Box 2208, Iraklion 71003, Crete, Greece
    • ,
  • Konstantinos Chlapoutakis

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, P.O. Box 2208, Iraklion 71003, Crete, Greece
    • ,
  • John Damilakis

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, P.O. Box 2208, Iraklion 71003, Crete, Greece
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +30 2810 392569; fax: +30 2810 542095.

Received 17 September 2008 ,Accepted 16 March 2009.

References 

  1. Dickinson G, Stiell IG, Schull M, et al. Retrospective application of the NEXUS low-risk criteria for cervical spine radiography in Canadian Emergency Departments. Ann Emerg Med. 2004;43:507–514
  2. Sanchez B, Waxman K, Jones T, Conner S, Chung R, Becerra S. Cervical spine clearance in blunt trauma: evaluation of a computed tomography-based protocol. J Trauma. 2005;59:179–183
  3. Schenarts PJ, Diaz J, Kaiser C, Carrillo Y, Eddy V, Morris JA. Prospective comparison of admission computed tomographic scan and plain films of the upper cervical spine in trauma patients with altered mental status. J Trauma. 2001;51:663–669
  4. Daffner RH, Hackney DB. ACR Appropriateness Criteria on suspected spine trauma. J Am Coll Radiol. 2007;4(11):762–775
  5. Van Goethem JW, Maes M, Ozsarlak O, van den Hauwe L, Parizel PM. Imaging in spinal trauma. Eur Radiol. 2005;15(3):582–590
  6. Blackmore CC, Mann FA, Wilson AJ. Helical CT in the primary trauma evaluation of the cervical spine: an evidence-based approach. Skeletal Radiol. 2000;29:632–639
  7. Berne JD, Velmahos GC, El-Tawil Q, et al. Value of complete cervical helical computed tomographic scanning in identifying cervical spine injury in the unevaluable blunt trauma patient with multiple injuries: a prospective study. J Trauma. 1999;47(5):896–902
  8. Begemann PGC, Kemper J, Gatzka C, Stork A, Nolte-Ernsting C, Adam G. Value of multiplanar reformations (MPR) in multidetector CT (MDCT) of acute vertebral fractures do we still have to read the transverse images?. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2004;28:572–580
  9. Griffen MM, Frykberg ER, Kerwin AJ, et al. Radiographic clearance of blunt cervical spine injury: plain radiograph or computed tomography scan?. J Trauma. 2003;55:222–227
  10. Gale SC, Gracias VH, Reilly PM, Schwab CW. The inefficiency of plain radiography to evaluate the cervical spine after blunt trauma. J Trauma. 2005;59:1121–1125
  11. McCulloch PT, France J, Jones DL, et al. Helical computed tomography alone compared with plain radiographs with adjunct computed tomography to evaluate the cervical spine after high-energy trauma. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:2388–2394
  12. Bach CM, Steingruber IE, Peer S, Peer-Kühberger R, Jaschke W, Ogon M. Radiographic evaluation of cervical spine trauma plain radiography and conventional tomography versus computed tomography. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2001;121:385–387
  13. Widder S, Doig C, Burrowes P, Larsen G, Hurlbert RJ, Kortbeek JB. Prospective evaluation of computed tomographic scanning for the spinal clearance of obtunded trauma patients: preliminary results. J Trauma. 2004;56:1179–1184
  14. Nguyen GK, Clark R. Adequacy of plain radiography in the diagnosis of cervical spine injuries. Emerg Radiol. 2005;11:158–161
  15. Mathen R, Inaba K, Munera F, et al. Prospective evaluation of multislice computed tomography versus plain radiographic cervical spine clearance in trauma patients. J Trauma. 2007;62:1427–1431
  16. Brix G, Nagel HD, Stamm G, et al. Radiation exposure in multi-slice versus single-slice spiral CT: results of a nationwide survey. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:1979–1991
  17. Kaul A, Bauer B, Bernhardt J, Nosske D, Veit R. Effective doses to members of the public from the diagnostic application of ionizing radiation in Germany. Eur Radiol. 1997;7:1127–1132
  18. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2277–2284
  19. Hall EJ, Brenner DJ. Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology. Br J Radiol. 2008;81(965):362–378
  20. Vandemark RM. Radiology of the cervical spine in trauma patients: practice pitfalls and recommendations for improving efficiency and communication. Am J Roentgenol. 1990;155:465–472
  21. Hanson JA, Blackmore CC, Mann FA, Wilson AJ. Cervical spine injury: a clinical decision rule to identify highrisk patients for helical CT screening. Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:713–717
  22. ICRP Publication 60. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1990.
  23. Faulkner K, Broadhead DA, Harrison RM. Patient dosimetry measurement methods. Appl Radiat Isot. 1999;50(1):113–123
  24. Teeuwisse W, Geleijns J, Veldkamp W. An inter-hospital comparison of patient dose based on clinical indications. Eur Radiol. 2007;17(7):1795–1805
  25. Richards PJ, Summerfield R, George J, Hamid A, Oakley P. Major trauma & cervical clearance radiation doses & cancer induction. Injury. 2008;39(3):347–356
  26. Rybicki F, Nawfel RD, Judy PF, et al. Skin and thyroid dosimetry in cervical spine screening: two methods for evaluation and a comparison between a helical CT and radiographic trauma series. Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:933–937
  27. Holmes JF, Akkinepalli R. Computed tomography versus plain radiography to screen for cervical spine injury: a meta-analysis. J Trauma. 2005;58(5):902–905
  28. Committee to Assess Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation; Nuclear and Radiation Studies Board, Division on Earth and Life Studies, National Research Council of the National Academies. Health Risks From Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2006.

PII: S0720-048X(09)00147-8

doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.03.024

European Journal of Radiology
Volume 75, Issue 1 , Pages 82-86 , July 2010

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution