European Journal of Radiology
Volume 73, Issue 2 , Pages 266-273 , February 2010

Diagnostic accuracy of 64 multislice CT angiography in the assessment of coronary in-stent restenosis: A meta-analysis

  • Zhonghua Sun

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Present address: Discipline of Medical Imaging, Department of Imaging and Applied Physics, Curtin University of Technology, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia. Tel.: +61 8 9266 7509; fax: +61 8 9266 4344.
    • ,
  • Abdulrahman Marzouq D. Almutairi

Received 7 July 2008 ,Revised 18 September 2008 ,Accepted 28 October 2008.

References 

  1. Serruys PW, de Jaegere P, Keimeneij G, et al. Benestent Study group: A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:489–495
  2. Fischman DL, Leon MB, Baim DS, et al. Stent Restenosis Study Investigators: A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:496–501
  3. Holmes DR, Leon MB, Moses JW, et al. Analysis of 1-year clinical outcomes in the SIRIUS trial: a randomized trial of a sirolimus-eluting stent versus a standard stent in patients at high risk for coronary restenosis. Circulation. 2004;109:634–640
  4. Morice MC, Colombo A, Meire B, et al. Sirolimus- vs paclitaxel-eluting stents in de novo coronary artery lesions: the REALITY trial: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2006;295:895–904
  5. Grech ED. ABC of interventional cardiology: percutaneous coronary intervention. II: the procedure. BMJ. 2003;326:1137–1140
  6. Ropers D, Rixe J, Anders K, et al. Usefulness of multidetector row spiral computed tomography with 64×0.6-mm collimation and 330-ms rotation for the non-invasive detection of significant coronary artery stenosis. Am J Cardiol. 2006;97:343–348
  7. Fine JJ, Hopkins CB, Ruff N, Butterfield LO. Comparison of accuracy of 64-slice cardiovascular computed tomography with coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 2006;97:173–174
  8. Kruger S, Mahnken AH, Sinha AM, et al. Multislice spiral computed tomography for the detection of coronary stent restenosis and patency. Int J Cardiol. 2003;89:167–172
  9. Maintz D, Grude M, Fallenberg EM, Heindel W, Fischbach R. Assessment of coronary arterial stents by multislice-CT angiography. Acta Radiol. 2003;44:597–603
  10. Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, Jukema JW, et al. Feasibility of assessment of coronary stent patency using 16-slice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol. 2004;94:427–430
  11. Sun Z, Jiang W. Diagnostic value of multislice CT angiography in coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. Eur J R. 2006;60:279–286
  12. Sun Z, Lin CH, Davidson R. Multi-detector row CT angiography in the assessment of coronary in-stent restenosis: a systematic review. Eur J R; (in press).
  13. Schuijf JD, Pundziute G, Jukema JW, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multislice computed tomography in the non-invasive evaluation of significant coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 2006;98:145–148
  14. Flohr TG, McCollough CH, Bruder H, et al. First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:256–268
  15. Rixe J, Achenbach S, Ropers D, et al. Assessment of coronary artery stent restenosis by 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography. Eur H J. 2006;27:2567–2572
  16. Rist C, von Zeigler F, Nikolaou K, et al. Assessment of coronary artery stent patency and restenosis using 64-slice computed tomography. Acad Radiol. 2006;13:1465–1473
  17. Das AM, El-Menyar AA, Salam AM, et al. Contrast-enhanced 64-section coronary multidetector CT angiography versus conventional coronary angiography for stent assessment. Radiology. 2007;245:424–432
  18. Schuijf JD, Pundziute G, Jukema JW, et al. Evaluation of patients with previous coronary stents implantation with 64-section CT. Radiology. 2007;245:416–423
  19. Ehara M, Surmely JF, Kawai M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography for detecting angiographically significant coronary artery stenosis in an unselected consecutive patient population: comparison with conventional invasive angiography. Circ J. 2006;70:564–571
  20. Cademartiri F, Schuijf JD, Pugliese F, et al. Usefulness of 64-slice multislice computed tomography coronary angiography to assess in-stent restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:2204–2210
  21. Oncel D, Oncel G, Karaca M. Coronary stent patency and in-stent restenosis: determination with 64-section multidetector CT coronary angiography-initial experience. Radiology. 2007;242:403–409
  22. Hecht HS, Zaric M, Jelnin V, Lubarsky L, Prakash M, Roubin G. Usefulness of 64-detector computed tomographic angiography for diagnosing in-stent restenosis in native coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol. 2008;101:820–824
  23. Carbone I, Francone M, Algeri E, et al. Non-invasive evaluation of coronary artery stent evaluation with retrospectively ECG-gated 64-slice CT angiography. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:234–243
  24. Nakamura K, Funabashi N, Uehara M, et al. Impairment factors for evaluating the patency of drug-eluting stents and bare metal stents in coronary arteries by 64-slice computed tomography versus conventional coronary angiography. Int J Cardiol. 2008;130:349–356
  25. Pugliese F, Weustink A, Van Mieghem C, et al. Dual-source coronary computed tomography angiography for detecting in-stent restenosis. Heart. 2008;94:848–854
  26. Carrabba N, Bamoshmoosh M, Carusi LM, et al. Usefulness of 64-slice multidetector computed tomography for detecting drug eluting in-stent restenosis. Am J Cardiol. 2007;100:1754–1758
  27. Oncel D, Oncel G, Tastan A, Tamci B. Evaluation of coronary stent patency and in-stent restenosis with dual-source CT coronary angiography without heart rate control. Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191:56–63
  28. Manghat N, Van Lingen R, Hewson P, et al. Usefulness of 64-detector row computed tomography for evaluation of intracoronary stents in symptomatic patients with suspected in-stent restenosis. Am J Cardiol. 2008;101:1567–1573
  29. Schepis T, Koepfli P, Leschka S, et al. Coronary artery stent geometry and in-stent contrast attenuation with 64-slice computed tomography. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:1464–1473
  30. Cademartiri F, Palumbo A, Maffei E, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice CT in the assessment of coronary stents. Radiol Med. 2007;112:526–537
  31. Hamon M, Champ-Rigot L, Morello R, Riddell JW, Hamon M. Diagnostic accuracy of in-stent coronary restenosis detection with multislice spiral computed tomography: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:217–225
  32. Vanhoenacker PK, Decramer I, Bladt O, et al. Multidetector computed tomography angiography for assessment of in-stent restenosis: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance. BMC Med Imaging. 2008;8:14
  33. Gaspar T, Halon DA, Lewis BS, et al. Diagnosis of coronary in-stent restenosis with multidetector row spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:1573–1579
  34. Gilard M, Cornily JC, Pennec PY, et al. Assessment of coronary artery stents by 16 slice computed tomography. Heart. 2006;92:58–61
  35. Sheth T, Dodd JD, Hoffman U, et al. Coronary stent assessability by 64 slice multi-detector computed tomography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007;69:933–938
  36. Pugliese F, Cademartiri E, van Mieghem C, et al. Multidetector CT for visualization of coronary stents. Radiographics. 2006;26:887–904
  37. Lau J, Ioannidis JP, Schmid CH. Summing up evidence: one answer is not always enough. Lancet. 1998;351:123–127

PII: S0720-048X(08)00582-2

doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.10.025

European Journal of Radiology
Volume 73, Issue 2 , Pages 266-273 , February 2010

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution