European Journal of Radiology
Volume 73, Issue 2 , Pages 260-265, February 2010

MR image analysis: Longitudinal cardiac motion influences left ventricular measurements

  • Patrick Berkovic

      Affiliations

    • University Hospital Antwerp, Department of Cardiology, Belgium
  • ,
  • Maarten Hemmink

      Affiliations

    • University Hospital Antwerp, Department of Cardiology, Belgium
  • ,
  • Paul M. Parizel

      Affiliations

    • University Hospital Antwerp, Department of Radiology, Belgium
  • ,
  • Christiaan J. Vrints

      Affiliations

    • University Hospital Antwerp, Department of Cardiology, Belgium
  • ,
  • Bernard P. Paelinck

      Affiliations

    • University Hospital Antwerp, Department of Cardiology, Belgium
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Bernard P. Paelinck, Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Antwerp, Wilrijkstraat 10, 2650 Edegem, Belgium. Tel.: +32 3 8214182; fax: +32 3 8250848.

Received 29 April 2008; received in revised form 26 September 2008; accepted 28 October 2008.

Abstract 

Background

Software for the analysis of left ventricular (LV) volumes and mass using border detection in short-axis images only, is hampered by through-plane cardiac motion. Therefore we aimed to evaluate software that involves longitudinal cardiac motion.

Methods

Twenty-three consecutive patients underwent 1.5-Tesla cine magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the entire heart in the long-axis and short-axis orientation with breath-hold steady-state free precession imaging. Offline analysis was performed using software that uses short-axis images (Medis MASS) and software that includes two-chamber and four-chamber images to involve longitudinal LV expansion and shortening (CAAS-MRV). Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility was assessed by using Bland–Altman analysis.

Results

Compared with MASS software, CAAS-MRV resulted in significantly smaller end-diastolic (156±48ml versus 167±52ml, p=0.001) and end-systolic LV volumes (79±48ml versus 94±52ml, p<0.001). In addition, CAAS-MRV resulted in higher LV ejection fraction (52±14% versus 46±13%, p<0.001) and calculated LV mass (154±52g versus 142±52g, p=0.004). Intraobserver and interobserver limits of agreement were similar for both methods.

Conclusion

MR analysis of LV volumes and mass involving long-axis LV motion is a highly reproducible method, resulting in smaller LV volumes, higher ejection fraction and calculated LV mass.

Keywords: Magnetic resonance imaging, Left ventricular, Analysis

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0720-048X(08)00580-9

doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.10.027

European Journal of Radiology
Volume 73, Issue 2 , Pages 260-265, February 2010