European Journal of Radiology
Volume 64, Issue 3 , Pages 439-446 , December 2007

Can independent coronal multiplanar reformatted images obtained using state-of-the-art MDCT scanners be used for primary interpretation of MDCT of the abdomen and pelvis? A feasibility study

Received 4 August 2006 ,Revised 5 December 2006 ,Accepted 6 March 2007.

References 

  1. Prokop M. General principles of MDCT. Eur J Radiol. 2003;45(Suppl 1):S4–S10
  2. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation: sources and effects of ionizing radiation. UNSCEAR 1993 report to the General Assembly. United Nations, New York; 1993. p. 280–3.
  3. Spelic DC, Suleiman OH, Kaczmarek RV, Stern SH, Moyal A. Nation-wide evaluation of X-ray trends (NEXT) survey of patient radiation exposure from computed tomographic (CT) examinations in the United States. In: Poster presentation at the annual meeting of the Radiological Society of North America. Chicago. November 2001;
  4. Horton KM, Fishman EK. The current status of multidetector row CT and three-dimensional imaging of the small bowel. Radiol Clin North Am. 2003;41(2):199–212
  5. Wong K, Paulson EK, Nelson RC. Breath-hold three-dimensional CT of the liver with multi-detector row helical CT. Radiology. 2001;219(1):75–79
  6. Prokesch RW, Chow LC, Beaulieu CF, et al. Local staging of pancreatic carcinoma with multi-detector row CT: use of curved planar reformations initial experience. Radiology. 2002;225(3):759–765
  7. Paulson EK, Jaffe TA, Thomas J, Harris JP, Nelson RC. MDCT of patients with acute abdominal pain: a new perspective using coronal reformations from submillimeter isotropic voxels. Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183(4):899–906
  8. Jaffe TA, Nelson RC, Johnson GA, et al. Optimization of multiplanar reformations from isotropic data sets acquired with 16-detector row helical CT scanner. Radiology. 2006;238(1):292–299

PII: S0720-048X(07)00139-8

doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.03.002

European Journal of Radiology
Volume 64, Issue 3 , Pages 439-446 , December 2007