European Journal of Radiology
Volume 64, Issue 3 , Pages 456-464 , December 2007

Efficacy and safety of gadodiamide (Gd-DTPA-BMA) in renal 3D-magnetic resonance angiography (MRA): A phase II study

Received 8 November 2006 ,Revised 21 February 2007 ,Accepted 23 February 2007.

References 

  1. Prince MR, Grist TM, Debatin JF. Renal arteries. 3D contrast MR angiography. Berlin: Springer; 1999;pp. 89–105
  2. Alhaddad IA, Blum S, Heller EN, et al. Renal artery stenosis in minority patients undergoing diagnostic cardiac catheterization: prevalence and risk factors. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2001;2:147–153
  3. Fatica RA, Port FK, Young EW. Incidence trends and mortality in end-stage renal disease attributed to renovascular disease in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001;37:1184–1190
  4. Leung DA, Hagspiel KD, Angle JF, et al. MR angiography of the renal arteries. Radiol Clin N Am. 2002;40:847–865
  5. Mallouhi A, Schocke M, Judmaier W, et al. 3D MR angiography of the renal arteries: comparison of volume rendering and maximum intensity projection algorithms. Radiology. 2002;223:509–516
  6. Gilfeather M, Yoon HC, Siegelmann ES, et al. Renal artery stenosis: evaluation with conventional angiography versus gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology. 1999;210:372–376
  7. Masanuga H, Takehara Y, Isoda H, et al. Assessment of gadolinium-enhanced time-resolved three-dimensional MR angiography for evaluating renal artery stenosis. Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:1213–1219
  8. Chen Q, Quijano CV, Mai VM, et al. On improving temporal and spatial resolution of 3D contrast-enhanced body MR angiography with parallel imaging. Radiology. 2004;231:893–899
  9. Ho VB, Foo TKF, Czum JM, Marcos H, Choyke PL, Knopp MV. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: technical considerations for optimized clinical implementation. Topics Mag Reson Imag. 2001;12:283–299
  10. Maki JH, Knopp MV, Prince M. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Appl Radiol. 2003;(Suppl.):182–210
  11. Holland GA, Dougherty L, Carpenter JP, et al. Breath-hold ultrafast three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the aorta and the renal and other visceral abdominal arteries. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;166:971–981
  12. De Cobelli F, Vanzulli A, Sironi S, et al. Renal artery stenosis: evaluation with breath-hold, three-dimensional, dynamic, gadolinium-enhanced versus three-dimensional, phase-contrast MR angiography. Radiology. 1997;205:689–695
  13. Hany TF, Debatin JF, Leung DA, Pfammatter T. Evaluation of the aortoiliac and renal arteries: comparison of breath-hold, contrast-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography with conventional catheter angiography. Radiology. 1997;204:357–362
  14. Bakker J, Beek FJ, Beutler JJ, et al. Renal artery stenosis and accessory renal arteries: accuracy of detection and visualization with gadolinium-enhanced breathold MR angiography. Radiology. 1998;207:497–504
  15. Hany TF, Leung DA, Pfammater T, Debati JF. Contrast-enhanced magnetic angiography of the renal arteries: original investigation. Invest Radiol. 1998;33:653–659
  16. Thornton J, O’ Callaghan J, Walshe J, O’Brien E, Varghese JC, Lee MJ. Comparison of digital subtraction angiography with gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis. Eur Radiol. 1999;9(5):930–934
  17. Korst MBJM, Joosten FBM, Postam CT, Jager GJ, Krabbe JK, Barentsz JO. Accuracy of normal-dose contrast-enhanced MR angiography in assessing renal artery stenosis and accessory renal arteries. AJR. 2000;174:629–634
  18. Völk M, Strotzer M, Lenhart M, et al. Time resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography of renal artery stenosis: diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability. Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:1583–1588
  19. Fain SB, King BF, Breen JF, Kruger DG, Riederer SJ. High-spatial-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the renal arteries: a prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Radiology. 2001;218:481–490
  20. Kroencke TJ, Wasser MN, Pattynama PMT, et al. Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and renal arteries. Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:1573–1582
  21. Douek PC, Contrast-enhanced . MR angiography of the abdominal aorta. In:  Schneider G,  Prince MR,  Meaney JFM,  Ho VB editor. Magnetic resonance angiography. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer Milan; 2005;p. 195–253
  22. Prokop M, Schneider G, Vanzulli A, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the renal arteries: blinded multicenter crossover comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine. Radiology. 2005;234:399–408
  23. Schaefer FKW, Schaefer PJ, Altjohann C, et al. A multicenter, site-independent, blinded study to compare the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography using 1.0M gadobutrol (Gadovist™) to intraarterial digital subtraction angiography in body arteries. Eur Radiol. 2007;61:315–323
  24. Unterweger M, Froehlich JM, Kubik-Huch RA, et al. Dose optimization of contrast-enhanced carotid MR angiography. Eur Radiol. 2005;15:1797–1805
  25. Carvlin MJ, Arger PH, Kundel HL, et al. Use of Gd-DTPA and fast gradient-echo and spin-echo imaging to demonstrate renal function in the rabbit. Radiology. 1989;170:705–711
  26. May DA, Pennington DJ. Effect of gadolinium concentration on signal intensity: an in vitro study with a slime bag model. Radiology. 2000;216:232–236
  27. Blaimer M, Breuer F, Mueller M, Heidemann RM, Griswold MA, Jakob PM. SMASH, SENSE, PILS, GRAPPA: how to choose the optimal method. Review. Topics Mag Reson Imag. 2004;15:223–236
  28. Mitsuzaki K, Yasuyuki Y, Tatsuya S, Ichiro O, Mutsumasa T, Yasuhiro H. Abdomen, pelvis, and eExtremities: diagnostic accuracy of dynamic contrast-enhanced turbo MR angiography compared with conventional angiography—initial experience. Radiology. 2000;216:909–915
  29. Michaely HJ, Schoenberg SO, Ittrich C, Dikow R, Bock M, Guenther M. Renal disease: value of functional magnetic resonance imaging with flow and perfusion measurements. Invest Radiol. 2004;39:698–705
  30. Schoenberg SO, Knopp MV, Londy F, et al. Morphologic and functional magnetic resonance imaging of renal artery stenosis: a multireader tricenter study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002;13:158–169

PII: S0720-048X(07)00111-8

doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.02.034

European Journal of Radiology
Volume 64, Issue 3 , Pages 456-464 , December 2007

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution