European Journal of Radiology
Volume 62, Issue 2 , Pages 160-165, May 2007

A shift in the diagnostics of the small intestine tumors

  • Zdenek Kala

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Faculty Hospital Brno, Jihlavska 20, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic
    • Tel.: +420 532 232 983.
  • ,
  • Vlastimil Válek

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Faculty Hospital Brno, Jihlavska 20, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic
    • Tel. + 420 532 233 007.
  • ,
  • Petr Kysela

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Faculty Hospital Brno, Jihlavska 20, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Department of Surgery, Faculty Hospital Brno, Jihlavska 20, Brno 62500, Czech Republic. Tel.: +420 532 232 983; fax: +420 532 233 900.
  • ,
  • Tomáš Svoboda

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Faculty Hospital Brno, Jihlavska 20, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic
    • Tel.: +420 532 232 983.

Received 13 January 2007; accepted 19 January 2007.

Abstract 

Primary, secondary, benign or malignant tumorous diseases of the small intestine are rare. They are very often diagnosed by accident or as a cause of acute abdomen. This work should answer the question, whether there is a method of making the diagnosis earlier when the disease is limited and easy to cure.

Methodology

A retrospective study comprising 96 patients having undergone surgery for a small intestine tumor in our hospital from 1996 to 2005 is presented. An analysis of first symptoms, diagnostic methods and number of patients admitted during the years was made. In the year 1998 we changed our philosophy in trying to directly detect the small intestine pathology and not making the diagnosis by the exclusion only. Intestinal ultrasound was performed on the Ultramark 3000 HDI device with autofocussable convex 5MHz and linear 7.5MHz probes or nowadays ATL 5000 HDI, 7–12MHz linear probe. No contrast enhancement was used. Abdominal CT engaged Somatom Plus appliance by Siemens, single detector with our conventional abdominal CT protocol. Enteroclysis was done with Micropaque suspension diluted 1:1 with HP-7000 300ml with its application rate of 75ml/min followed by HP-7000 solution 2000ml, application rate of 120ml/min.

Results

We treated surgically 96 patients with the small intestine tumor. A shift in the diagnostic algorithm was noticed in the bowel ultrasound now taking the lead. An enlarged portion of patients diagnosed by means of capsule endoscopy was also seen. An increase of surgically treated patients after 1998 was recorded and the majority of them could be offered an elective laparoscopic surgery in contrast to before 1998 when the majority of them had undergone surgery for an acute abdomen.

Conclusion

The small bowel ultrasound can be recommended as the first choice method. All patients with even very moderate abdominal symptoms ought to be examined for the small intestine pathology. As a result one can get higher rate of elective surgery, if possible laparoscopic and higher number of R0 resections accompanied by longer survival.

Keywords: Small intestine, Tumor, Diagnostics, Ultrasound, Enteroclysis, Computer tomography

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0720-048X(07)00047-2

doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.01.023

European Journal of Radiology
Volume 62, Issue 2 , Pages 160-165, May 2007