European Journal of Radiology
Volume 62, Issue 2 , Pages 220-226 , May 2007

Can multislice CT alone rule out reliably pulmonary embolism? A prospective study

  • Jose Pamies Guilabert

      Affiliations

    • Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Spain
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico de Adultos, Hospital Universitario La FE, Avenida Campanar No. 21, 46009 Valencia, Spain. Tel.: +34 96 349 86 45; fax: +34 96 386 27 32.
  • ,
  • Dolores Nauffal Manzur

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pneumology, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Spain
  • ,
  • Maria J. Torres Tarrasa

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Spain
  • ,
  • Maximiliano Lloret Llorens

      Affiliations

    • Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Spain
  • ,
  • Petra Braun

      Affiliations

    • Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Hospital La Plana of Vila-real, Spain
  • ,
  • Maria P. Bello Arques

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Spain

Received 11 September 2006 ,Revised 23 November 2006 ,Accepted 24 November 2006.

References 

  1. The PIOPED Investigators . Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism. Results of the prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis (PIOPED). JAMA. 1990;263:2753–2759
  2. Baile EM, King GG, Müller NL, et al. Spiral computed tomography is comparable to angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;161:1010–1015
  3. Stein PD, Athanasoulis C, Alavi A, et al. Complications and validity of pulmonary angiography in acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation. 1992;85:462–468
  4. Mills SR, Jackson DC, Older RA, et al. The incidence, etiologies, and avoidance of complications of pulmonary angiography in a large series. Radiology. 1980;136:295–299
  5. The PIOPED II Investigators . Multidetector computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:2317–2327
  6. Hayashino Y, Goto M, Noguchi Y, Fukui T. Ventilation–perfusion scanning and helical CT in suspected pulmonary embolism: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance. Radiology. 2005;234:740–748
  7. Rathbun SW, Raskob GE, Whitsett TL. Sensitivity and specificity of helical computed tomography in diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132:227–232
  8. Goodman LR, Curtin JJ, Mewissen MW, et al. Detection of pulmonary embolism in patients with unresolved clinical and scintigraphic diagnosis: helical CT versus angiography. AJR. 1995;164:1369–1374
  9. Garg K, Welsh CH, Feyerabend AJ, et al. Pulmonary embolism: diagnosis with spiral CT and ventilation–perfusion scanning. Correlation with pulmonary angiographic results or clinical outcome. Radiology. 1998;208:201–208
  10. Kim KI, Müller NL, Mayo JR. Clinically suspected pulmonary embolism: utility of spiral CT. Radiology. 1999;210:693–697
  11. Blachere H, Latrabe V, Montaudon M, et al. Pulmonary embolism revealed on helical CT angiography: comparison with ventilation–perfusion radionuclide lung scanning. AJR. 2000;174:1041–1047
  12. Qanadli SD, Hajjam ME, Mesurolle B, et al. Pulmonary embolism detections: prospective evaluation of dual-section helical CT versus selective pulmonary arteriography in 157 patients. Radiology. 2000;217:447–455
  13. Tillie-Leblond I, Mastora I, Radenne F, et al. Risk of pulmonary embolism after a negative spiral CT angiogram in patients with pulmonary disease: 1-year clinical follow-up study. Radiology. 2002;223:461–467
  14. Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Baghaie F, Friboug M, Artaud D, Duchamel A. Clinical value of thin collimation in the diagnostic workup of pulmonary embolism. AJR. 2000;175:407–411
  15. van Strijen MJL, de Monyé W, Schirieck J, et al. Single-detector helical computed tomography as the primary diagnostic test in suspected pulmonary embolism: a multicenter clinical management study of 510 patients. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:307–314
  16. Eyer BA, Goodman LR, Washington L. Clinicians’ response to radiologists’ reports of isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism or inconclusive interpretation of pulmonary embolism using MDCT. AJR. 2005;184:623–628
  17. Goodman LR. Small pulmonary emboli: What do we know?. Radiology. 2005;234:654–658
  18. Musset D, Parent F, Meyer G, et al. Diagnostic strategy for patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a prospective multicentre outcome study. Lancet. 2002;360:1914–1920
  19. Perrier A, Roy PM, Sanchez O, et al. Multidetector-row computed tomography in suspected pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1760–1768
  20. Goldhaber SZ. Pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:93–104
  21. Coche EE, Hamoir XL, Hammer FD, Hainaut P, Goffette PP. Using dual-detector helical CT angiography to detect deep venous thrombosis in patients with suspicion of pulmonary embolism: diagnostic value and additional findings. AJR. 2001;176:1035–1039
  22. Garg K, Kemp JL, Wojcik D, et al. Thromboembolic disease: comparison of combined CT pulmonary angiography and venography with bilateral leg sonography in 70 patients. AJR. 2000;175:997–1001
  23. Cham MD, Yankelevitz DF, Shaham D, Shah AA, et al. Deep venous thrombosis: detection by using indirect CT venography. Radiology. 2000;216:744–751
  24. Begemann PGC, Bonacker M, Kemper J, et al. Evaluation of the deep venous system in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism with multi-detector CT: a prospective study in comparison to Doppler sonography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2003;27:399–409
  25. Wicki J, Perneger TV, Junod AF, Bounameaux H, Perrier A. Assessing clinical probability of pulmonary embolism in the emergency ward. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:92–97
  26. Mayo JR, Remy-Jardin M, Müller NL, et al. Pulmonary embolism: prospective comparison of spiral CT with ventilation–perfusion scintigraphy. Radiology. 1997;205:447–452
  27. Heit JA, Silverstein MD, Mohr DN, et al. The epidemiology of venous thromboembolism in the community. Thromb Haemost. 2001;86:452–463
  28. Ferreti GR, Bosson JL, Buffaz PD, et al. Acute pulmonary embolism: role of helical CT in 164 patient with intermediate probability at ventilation–perfusion scintigraphy and normal results at duplex US of the legs. Radiology. 1997;205:453–458
  29. Garg K, Sieler H, Welsh CH, Johnston RJ, Russ PD. Clinical validity of helical CT being interpreted as negative for pulmonary embolism: implications for patient treatment. AJR. 1999;172:1627–1631
  30. Goodman LR, Lipchik RJ, Kuzo RS, Liu Y, McAuliffe TL, O’Brien DJ. Subsequent pulmonary embolism: risk after a negative helical CT pulmonary angiogram-prospective comparison with scintigraphy. Radiology. 2000;215:535–542
  31. Ost D, Rozenshtein A, Saffran L, Snider A. The negative predictive value of spiral computed tomography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in patients with nondiagnostic ventilation–perfusion scans. Am J Med. 2001;110:16–21
  32. Bourriot K, Couffinhal T, Bernard V, et al. Clinical outcome after a negative spiral CT pulmonary angiographic finding in an inpatient population from cardiology and pneumology wards. Chest. 2003;123:359–365
  33. Kavanagh EC, O’Hare A, Hargaden G, Murray JG. Risk of pulmonary embolism after negative MDCT pulmonary angiography findings. AJR. 2004;182:499–504
  34. Revel MP, Petrover D, Hernigou A, Lefort C, Meyer G, Frija G. Diagnosing pulmonary embolism with four-detector row helical CT: prospective evaluation of 216 outpatients and inpatients. Radiology. 2005;234:265–273
  35. Novelline RA, Baltarowich OH, Athanasoulis CA, et al. The clinical course of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism and a negative pulmonary arteriogram. Radiology. 1978;126:561–567
  36. Loud PA, Kats DS, Bruce DA, Klippenstein DL, Grossman ZD. Deep venous thrombosis with suspected pulmonary embolism: detection with combined CT venography and pulmonary angiography. Radiology. 2001;219:498–502
  37. Loud PA, Grossman ZD, Klippenstein DL, Ray CE. Combined CT venography and pulmonary angiography: a new diagnostic technique for suspected thromboembolic disease. AJR. 1998;170:951–954

PII: S0720-048X(06)00520-1

doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.11.032

European Journal of Radiology
Volume 62, Issue 2 , Pages 220-226 , May 2007