European Journal of Radiology
Volume 54, Issue 2 , Pages 246-252, May 2005

Double phase CT during hepatic arteriography for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma

  • Takamichi Murakami

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +81 6 6879 3434; fax: +81 6 6879 3439.
  • ,
  • Manabu Takamura

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Sakai Municipal Hospital, 1-1-1, Minamiyasui-cho, Sakai, Osaka 590-0064, Japan
  • ,
  • Tonsok Kim

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
  • ,
  • Masatoshi Hori

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
  • ,
  • Michael P Federle

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop St., Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
  • ,
  • Hiromitsu Onishi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
  • ,
  • Kaname Tomoda

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
  • ,
  • Hironobu Nakamura

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan

Received 26 March 2004; received in revised form 19 May 2004; accepted 25 May 2004.

Abstract 

Rationale and objectives:

The purpose of this study is to assess the diagnostic impact of double phase computed tomography during hepatic arteriography for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Materials and methods:

118 hepatocellular carcinomas in 73 cirrhotic patients who underwent double phase computed tomography during hepatic arteriography were enrolled in this study. Double phase computed tomography during hepatic arteriography consisted of computed tomography images obtained at 5–10s (first phase) and 40–50s (second phase) after the initiation of an intraarterial administration of 40–60ml of contrast medium through the hepatic artery. Diagnostic accuracy of the first phase computed tomography during hepatic arteriography alone and double phase computed tomography during hepatic arteriography images for hepatocellular carcinoma were separately analyzed by three blinded readers independently. Alternative-free response receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to compare each set of computed tomography during hepatic arteriography images.

Results:

The detection sensitivity of the double phase CTHA for HCC (mean, 83.1%) was significantly higher than that of the first phase CTHA alone (mean, 73.4%) (P < 0.01). Moreover, the positive predictive value of the double phase CTHA (mean, 93.7%) was higher than that of the first phase CTHA alone (87.4%). The area under the AFROC curve (Az value) of the double phase CTHA (mean, 0.88) was significantly higher than that of the first phase CTHA alone (mean, 0.77) (P < 0.05).

Conclusions:

Double phase computed tomography during hepatic arteriography can improve the diagnostic accuracy of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Keywords: Computed tomography during hepatic arteriography, Hepatocellular carcinoma, Liver neoplasms

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0720-048X(04)00184-6

doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.05.013

European Journal of Radiology
Volume 54, Issue 2 , Pages 246-252, May 2005