European Journal of Radiology
Volume 54, Issue 2 , Pages 276-283, May 2005

Triphasic MRI of pelvic organ descent: sources of measurement error

  • Geert L. Morren

      Affiliations

    • The Bowel and Digestion Centre, The Oxford Clinic, 38 Oxford Terrace, Christchurch, New Zealand
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Present address: Rodestraat 36, B-3295 Diest, Belgium. Tel.: +32 13 312988.
  • ,
  • Adrian G. Balasingam

      Affiliations

    • Christchurch Radiology Group, P.O. Box 21107, 4th Floor, Leicester House, 291 Madras Street, Christchurch, New Zealand
  • ,
  • J. Elisabeth Wells

      Affiliations

    • Department of Public Health and General Medicine, Christchurch School of Medicine, St. Elmo Courts, Christchurch, New Zealand
  • ,
  • Anne M. Hunter

      Affiliations

    • Christchurch Radiology Group, P.O. Box 21107, 4th Floor, Leicester House, 291 Madras Street, Christchurch, New Zealand
  • ,
  • Richard H. Coates

      Affiliations

    • Christchurch Radiology Group, P.O. Box 21107, 4th Floor, Leicester House, 291 Madras Street, Christchurch, New Zealand
  • ,
  • Richard E. Perry

      Affiliations

    • The Bowel and Digestion Centre, The Oxford Clinic, 38 Oxford Terrace, Christchurch, New Zealand

Received 21 August 2003; received in revised form 6 May 2004; accepted 10 May 2004.

Abstract 

Purpose:

To identify sources of error when measuring pelvic organ displacement during straining using triphasic dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Materials and methods:

Ten healthy nulliparous woman underwent triphasic dynamic 1.5T pelvic MRI twice with 1 week between studies. The bladder was filled with 200ml of a saline solution, the vagina and rectum were opacified with ultrasound gel. T2 weighted images in the sagittal plane were analysed twice by each of the two observers in a blinded fashion. Horizontal and vertical displacement of the bladder neck, bladder base, introitus vaginae, posterior fornix, cul-de sac, pouch of Douglas, anterior rectal wall, anorectal junction and change of the vaginal axis were measured eight times in each volunteer (two images, each read twice by two observers). Variance components were calculated for subject, observer, week, interactions of these three factors, and pure error. An overall standard error of measurement was calculated for a single observation by one observer on a film from one woman at one visit.

Results:

For the majority of anatomical reference points, the range of displacements measured was wide and the overall measurement error was large. Intra-observer error and week-to-week variation within a subject were important sources of measurement error.

Conclusion:

Important sources of measurement error when using triphasic dynamic MRI to measure pelvic organ displacement during straining were identified. Recommendations to minimize those errors are made.

Keywords: Pelvic organs, MR, Pelvic organs, Prolapse, Pelvic organs, Movement, Analysis of variance, Variance components

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0720-048X(04)00180-9

doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.05.009

European Journal of Radiology
Volume 54, Issue 2 , Pages 276-283, May 2005