European Journal of Radiology
Volume 51 , Pages S3-S8 , June 2004

Contrast enhanced ultrasound in liver imaging

Received 1 March 2004 ,Revised 8 March 2004 ,Accepted 15 March 2004.

References 

  1. Marshall MM, Beese RC, Muiesan P, Sarma DI, O’Grady J, Sidhu PS. Assessment of portal venous system patency in the liver transplant candidate: a prospective study comparing ultrasound microbubble-enhanced colour Doppler ultrasound, with arteriography and surgery. Clin. Radiol. 2002;57:377–383
  2. Sidhu PS, Ellis SM, Karani JB, Ryan SM. Hepatic artery stenosis following liver transplantation: significance of the tardus parvus waveform and the role of microbubble contrast media in the detection of a focal stenosis. Clin. Radiol. 2002;57:789–799
  3. Blomley MJ, Albrecht T, Cosgrove DO, et al.  Improved imaging of liver metastases with stimulated acoustic emission in the late phase of enhancement with the US contrast agent SH U 508A: early experience. Radiology. 1999;210:409–416
  4. Tanaka S, Ioka T, Oshikawa O, Hamada Y, Yoshioka F. Dynamic sonography of hepatic tumors. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2001;177:799–805
  5. Bauer A, Solbiati L, Weissman N. Ultrasound imaging with SonoVue: low mechanical index real-time imaging. Acad. Radiol. 2002;9(Suppl 2):S282–S284
  6. Albrecht T, Blomley MJ, Burns PN, et al.  Improved detection of hepatic metastases with Pulse-Inversion US during the liver-specific phase of SHU 508A: multicenter study. Radiology. 2003;227:361–370
  7. Harvey CJ, Blomley MJ, Eckersley RJ, Heckemann RA, Butler-Barnes J, Cosgrove DO. Pulse-inversion mode imaging of liver specific microbubbles: improved detection of subcentimetre metastases. Lancet. 2000;355:807–808
  8. Esteban JM, Molla MA, Tomas C, Maldonado L. Improved detection of liver metastases with contrast-enhanced wideband harmonic imaging: comparison with CT findings. Eur. J. Ultrasound. 2002;15:119–126
  9. Skjoldbye B, Pedersen MH, Struckmann J, Burcharth F, Larsen T. Improved detection and biopsy of solid liver lesions using pulse-inversion ultrasound scanning and contrast agent infusion. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2002;28:439–444
  10. Forsberg F, Piccoli CW, Liu JB. Hepatic tumor detection: MR imaging and conventional US versus pulse-inversion harmonic US of NC100100 during its reticuloendothelial system-specific phase. Radiology. 2002;222:824–829
  11. Kono Y, Steinbach GC, Peterson T, Schmid-Schonbein GW, Mattrey RF. Mechanism of parenchymal enhancement of the liver with a microbubble-based US contrast medium: an intravital microscopy study in rats. Radiology. 2002;224:253–257
  12. Hohmann J, Albrecht T, Hoffmann CW, Wolf KJ. Ultrasonographic detection of focal liver lesions: increased sensitivity and specificity with microbubble contrast agents. Eur. J. Radiol. 2003;46:147–159
  13. von Herbay A, Vogt C, Haussinger D. Pulse inversion sonography in the early phase of the sonographic contrast agent Levovist: differentiation between benign and malignant focal liver lesions. J. Ultrasound Med. 2002;21:1191–1200
  14. Lee JY, Choi BI, Han JK, Kim AY, Shin SH, Moon SG. Improved sonographic imaging of hepatic hemangioma with contrast-enhanced coded harmonic angiography: comparison with MR imaging. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2002;28:287–295
  15. Vilana R, Llovet JM, Bianchi L, et al.  Contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography and helical computed tomography for assessment of vascularity of small hepatocellular carcinomas before and after percutaneous ablation. J. Clin. Ultrasound. 2003;31:119–128
  16. Numata K, Isozaki T, Ozawa Y, et al.  Percutaneous ablation therapy guided by contrast-enhanced sonography for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2003;180:143–149
  17. Solbiati L, Goldberg SN, Ierace T, Dellanoce M, Livraghi T, Gazelle GS. Radio-frequency ablation of hepatic metastases: postprocedural assessment with a US microbubble contrast agent-early experience. Radiology. 1999;211:643–649
  18. Boehm T, Malich A, Goldberg SN, et al.  Radio-frequency ablation of VX2 rabbit tumors: assessment of completeness of treatment by using contrast-enhanced harmonic power Doppler US. Radiology. 2002;225:815–821
  19. Ding H, Kudo M, Onda H, et al.  Evaluation of posttreatment response of hepatocellular carcinoma with contrast-enhanced coded phase-inversion harmonic US: comparison with dynamic CT. Radiology. 2001;221:721–730
  20. Meloni MF, Goldberg SN, Livraghi T, et al.  Hepatocellular carcinoma treated with radiofrequency ablation: comparison of pulse inversion contrast-enhanced harmonic sonography, contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography, and helical CT. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2001;177:375–380
  21. Catalano O, Lobianco R, Sandomenico F, Siani A. Splenic trauma: evaluation with contrast-specific sonography and a second-generation contrast medium: preliminary experience. J. Ultrasound Med. 2003;22:467–477
  22. Albrecht T, Blomley MJ, Cosgrove DO, et al.  Non-invasive diagnosis of hepatic cirrhosis by transit-time analysis of an ultrasound contrast agent. Lancet. 1999;353:1579–1583
  23. von Herbay A, Vogt C, Haussinger D. Late-phase pulse-inversion sonography using the contrast agent levovist: differentiation between benign and malignant focal lesions of the liver. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2002;179:1273–1279
  24. Blomley MJ, Albrecht T, Cosgrove DO, et al.  Liver vascular transit time analyzed with dynamic hepatic venography with bolus injections of an US contrast agent: early experience in seven patients with metastases. Radiology. 1998;209:862–866
  25. Bang N, Nielsen MB, Rasmussen AN, Osterhammel PA, Pedersen JF. Hepatic vein transit time of an ultrasound contrast agent: simplified procedure using pulse inversion imaging. Br J. Radiol. 2001;74:752–755
  26. Sugimoto H, Kaneko T, Hirota M, Tezel E, Nakao A. Earlier hepatic vein transit-time measured by contrast ultrasonography reflects intrahepatic hemodynamic changes accompanying cirrhosis. J. Hepatol. 2002;37:578–583
  27. Ramnarine KV, Leen E, Oppo K, Angerson WJ, McArdle CS. Contrast-enhanced Doppler perfusion index: clinical and experimental evaluation. J. Ultrasound Med. 2002;21:1121–1129

PII: S0720-048X(04)00122-6

doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.03.022

European Journal of Radiology
Volume 51 , Pages S3-S8 , June 2004