European Journal of Radiology
Volume 51, Issue 2 , Pages 175-180, August 2004

Comparison of chest radiography and high-resolution computed tomography findings in early and low-grade coal worker’s pneumoconiosis

  • Ahmet Savranlar

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Zonguldak Karaelmas University, 67600 Kozlu, Zonguldak, Turkey
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +90-372-2610169; fax: +90-372-2610155.
  • ,
  • Remzi Altın

      Affiliations

    • Department Pulmonary Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Zonguldak Karaelmas University, 67600 Kozlu, Zonguldak, Turkey
  • ,
  • Kamran Mahmutyazıcıoğlu

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Zonguldak Karaelmas University, 67600 Kozlu, Zonguldak, Turkey
  • ,
  • Hüseyin Özdemir

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Zonguldak Karaelmas University, 67600 Kozlu, Zonguldak, Turkey
  • ,
  • Levent Kart

      Affiliations

    • Department Pulmonary Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Zonguldak Karaelmas University, 67600 Kozlu, Zonguldak, Turkey
  • ,
  • Tülay Özer

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Zonguldak Karaelmas University, 67600 Kozlu, Zonguldak, Turkey
  • ,
  • Sadi Gündoğdu

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Zonguldak Karaelmas University, 67600 Kozlu, Zonguldak, Turkey

Received 16 May 2003; received in revised form 16 October 2003; accepted 20 October 2003.

Abstract 

Introduction: High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is more sensitive than chest X-ray (CXR) in the depiction of parenchymal abnormalities. We aimed to present and compare CXR and HRCT findings in coal workers with and without early and low-grade coal worker’s pneumoconiosis (CWP). Materials and Methods: 71 coal workers were enrolled in this study. All workers were male. The CXR and HRCT of those workers were obtained and graded by two trained readers. HRCT’s were graded according to Hosoda and Shida’s Japanese classification. After grading, 67 workers with CXR profusion 0/0–2/2 were included in the study. Four patients with major opacity were excluded. Profusion 0/1 to 1/1 cases were accepted as early and profusion 1/2 and 2/2 cases as low-grade pneumoconiosis. Results: Discordance between CXR and HRCT was high. Discordance rate was found higher in the early pneumoconiosis cases with negative CXR than low-grade pneumoconiosis (60, 36 and 8%, respectively). When coal miners with normal CXR were evaluated by HRCT, six out of 10 cases were diagnosed as positive. In low-grade pneumoconiosis group, the number of patients with positive CXR but negative HRCT were low in comparison to patients with CXR negative and early pneumoconiosis findings. Most of the CXR category 0 patients (10/16) were diagnosed as category 1 by HRCT. Eleven cases diagnosed as CXR category 1 were diagnosed as category 0 (7/11) and category 2 (4/11) by HRCT. In CXR category 2 (eight cases), there were four cases diagnosed as category 1 by HRCT. Conclusions: Discordance between CXR and HRCT was high, especially for CXR negative and early pneumoconiosis cases. The role of CXR in screening coal workers to detect early pneumoconiosis findings should be questioned. We suggest using HRCT as a standard screening method instead of CXR to distinguish between normal and early pneumoconiosis.

Keywords:  Coal Worker’s Pneumoconiosis, CWP, HRCT, X-Ray

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0720-048X(03)00317-6

doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2003.10.017

European Journal of Radiology
Volume 51, Issue 2 , Pages 175-180, August 2004