European Journal of Radiology
Volume 51, Issue 2 , Pages 169-174, August 2004

Low-dose CT of the thorax in cancer follow-up

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Tohoku University, 1-1 Seiryo-machi Aoba-ku, Sendai 9808574, Japan

Received 31 May 2003; received in revised form 26 September 2003; accepted 30 September 2003.

Abstract 

Purpose: To evaluate the quality of low-dose computed tomography (CT) images in the follow-up of cancer patients. Materials and methods: We selected patients with urogenital (n=7) or esophageal cancer (n=13) who were attending routine follow-up between April and July 2001. After water and chest phantom studies to decide the scan parameters, postcontrast low-dose CT scans were obtained at 60mA (45mAs) with a smoothing kernel. Three radiologists reviewed the CT scans of the thorax independently for overall image quality and anatomic detail in both mediastinal and lung windows. They subjectively rated the images on a four-point scale (0: poor, 1: fair, 2: good, 3: excellent) according to graininess and sharpness. Results: The average score of the low-dose CT for the lung window was 2.85, which was equivalent to control images. The average score for the mediastinal window was 1.77, which was lower than that of the control CT scan (2.62, P<0.001) and almost identical to that of the chest phantom experiment. Nine of the 20 cases had abnormal findings; low-dose CT scans depicted them well and offered sufficient information for diagnosis. The radiation exposure was reduced by about half. Conclusion: The image quality of low-dose thoracic CT was satisfactory for both mediastinal and lung windows in the follow-up of cancer patients.

Keywords:  Low-dose CT, Thorax, Cancer follow up

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0720-048X(03)00298-5

doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2003.09.017

European Journal of Radiology
Volume 51, Issue 2 , Pages 169-174, August 2004