European Journal of Radiology
Volume 52, Issue 2 , Pages 103-109, November 2004

A comparison of left ventricular mass between two-dimensional echocardiography, using fundamental and tissue harmonic imaging, and cardiac MRI in patients with hypertension

  • Khaled Alfakih

      Affiliations

    • BHF Cardiac MR Unit, Room 170, D-Floor, Jubilee Wing, Leeds General Infirmary, Great George Street, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44-113-392-5167; fax: +44-113-392-5690.
  • ,
  • Tim Bloomer

      Affiliations

    • BHF Cardiac MR Unit, Room 170, D-Floor, Jubilee Wing, Leeds General Infirmary, Great George Street, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK
  • ,
  • Samantha Bainbridge

      Affiliations

    • Department of Echocardiography, Leeds General Infirmary, Great George Street, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK
  • ,
  • Gavin Bainbridge

      Affiliations

    • BHF Cardiac MR Unit, Room 170, D-Floor, Jubilee Wing, Leeds General Infirmary, Great George Street, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK
  • ,
  • John Ridgway

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medical Physics, Leeds General Infirmary, Great George Street, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK
  • ,
  • Gordon Williams

      Affiliations

    • Department of Echocardiography, Leeds General Infirmary, Great George Street, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK
  • ,
  • Mohan Sivananthan

      Affiliations

    • BHF Cardiac MR Unit, Room 170, D-Floor, Jubilee Wing, Leeds General Infirmary, Great George Street, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK

Received 8 May 2003; received in revised form 10 September 2003; accepted 12 September 2003.

Abstract 

Purpose: To compare left ventricular mass (LVM) as measured by two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography using two different calculation methods: truncated ellipse (TE) and area length (AL), in both fundamental and tissue harmonic imaging frequencies, to LVM as measured by, the current gold standard, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Turbo gradient echo (TGE) pulse sequence was utilized for MRI. Materials and methods: Thirty-two subjects with history of hypertension were recruited. The images were acquired, contours were traced and the LVM was calculated for all four different echocardiography methods as well as for the cardiac MRI method. The intra-observer variabilities were calculated. The four different echocardiography methods were compared to cardiac MRI using the method described by Bland and Altman. Results: Twenty-five subjects had adequate paired data sets. The mean LVM as measured by cardiac MRI was 162±55g and for the four different echocardiography methods were: fundamental AL 165±55g, harmonic AL 168±53g, fundamental TE 148±50g, harmonic TE 149±45g. The intra-observer variability for cardiac MRI method, expressed as bias ± 1 standard deviation of the difference (S.D.D.), was 2.3±9.2g and for the four different echocardiography methods were: fundamental TE 0.4±26.8g, fundamental AL 0.6±27.0g, harmonic TE 6.7±21.8g, harmonic AL 6.4±22.9g. The mean LVM for the AL method was closest to the cardiac MRI technique, while TE underestimated LVM. The 95% limits of agreement were consistently wide for all the 2D echocardiography modalities when compared with the cardiac MRI technique. Conclusion: The intra-observer variability in measurements of 2D echocardiographic LVM, together with the wide limits of agreement when compared to the gold standard (cardiac MRI) are sufficiently large to make serial estimates of LVM, of single patients or small groups of subjects, by 2D echocardiography, unreliable.

Keywords:  Hypertension, LVH, LVM, Cardiac MRI, 2D echocardiography, Tissue harmonic imaging

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This work was presented as an oral abstract at the 6th Annual Scientific Session of the Society of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Orlando, 2003.

PII: S0720-048X(03)00275-4

doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2003.09.015

European Journal of Radiology
Volume 52, Issue 2 , Pages 103-109, November 2004