European Journal of Radiology
Volume 49, Issue 3 , Pages 258-261, March 2004

Does intravenous glucagon improve common bile duct visualisation during magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography? Results in 42 patients

  • Paras U. Dalal

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Eastbourne District General Hospital, Kings Drive, Eastbourne, East Sussex BN21 2UD, UK
  • ,
  • David C. Howlett

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Eastbourne District General Hospital, Kings Drive, Eastbourne, East Sussex BN21 2UD, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44-1323-41-7400x4015; fax: +44-1323-41-4933.
  • ,
  • David F. Sallomi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Eastbourne District General Hospital, Kings Drive, Eastbourne, East Sussex BN21 2UD, UK
  • ,
  • Nigel D. Marchbank

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Eastbourne District General Hospital, Kings Drive, Eastbourne, East Sussex BN21 2UD, UK
  • ,
  • Gillian M.T. Watson

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Eastbourne District General Hospital, Kings Drive, Eastbourne, East Sussex BN21 2UD, UK
  • ,
  • Amanda Marr

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Eastbourne District General Hospital, Kings Drive, Eastbourne, East Sussex BN21 2UD, UK
  • ,
  • Arthur A. Dunk

      Affiliations

    • Department of Gastroenterology, Eastbourne District General Hospital, Kings Drive, Eastbourne, East Sussex BN21 2UD, UK
  • ,
  • Alastair D. Smith

      Affiliations

    • Department of Gastroenterology, Eastbourne District General Hospital, Kings Drive, Eastbourne, East Sussex BN21 2UD, UK

Received 23 January 2003; received in revised form 21 February 2003; accepted 25 February 2003.

Abstract 

Introduction: Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) has been demonstrated as a reliable, non-invasive means of biliary tract imaging among patients with suspected choledocholithiasis. The aim of this study was to establish the impact of intravenous glucagon administration (IVGA) upon visualisation of the common bile duct (CBD) and ampulla of Vater during MRCP. Materials and methods: Forty-two consecutive, non-diabetic subjects with a working diagnosis of symptomatic choledocholithiasis were scanned, pre- and post-IVGA using the half-Fourier, single shot, turbo-spin-echo (HASTE) sequence. Maximum intensity projections (optimised for the extra-hepatic biliary tree and ampulla of Vater) were reviewed blindly by three consultant radiologists. The CBD images were graded (0–3) according to the length of duct seen. The ampullary images were graded according to whether to it was visualised clearly (1), or not (0). Results: Following IVGA the CBD was visualised at grade 3 (75–100% of length seen) in 14 additional patients compared with images prior to IVGA. Furthermore, ampullary visualisation was considered diagnostic in 18 additional patients post-IVGA. No glucagon-associated adverse effects were observed. Conclusion: These results demonstrate that IVGA improved visualisation of the CBD and ampulla of Vater during magnetic resonance cholangiopanctreatography. This may reduce the requirement for repeat investigation or recourse to invasive diagnostic procedures (e.g. endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)).

Keywords: Glucagon, Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), Common bile duct (CBD), Ampulla

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0720-048X(03)00084-6

doi:10.1016/S0720-048X(03)00084-6

European Journal of Radiology
Volume 49, Issue 3 , Pages 258-261, March 2004