European Journal of Radiology
Volume 44, Issue 3 , Pages 216-224, December 2002

Differentiation of metastatic versus non-metastatic mediastinal lymph nodes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer using respiratory-triggered short inversion time inversion recovery (STIR) turbo spin-echo MR imaging

  • Daisuke Takenaka

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe 650-0017, Japan
  • ,
  • Yoshiharu Ohno

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe 650-0017, Japan
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +81-78-382-6104; fax: +81-78-382-6129
  • ,
  • Hiroto Hatabu

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA
  • ,
  • Chiho Ohbayashi

      Affiliations

    • Division of Pathology, Kobe University Hospital, 7-5-2 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe 650-0017, Japan
  • ,
  • Masahiro Yoshimura

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiovascular, Thoracic and Pediatric Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe 650-0017, Japan
  • ,
  • Yutaka Ohkita

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiovascular, Thoracic and Pediatric Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe 650-0017, Japan
  • ,
  • Kazuro Sugimura

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe 650-0017, Japan

Received 5 September 2002; received in revised form 6 September 2002; accepted 9 September 2002.

Abstract 

Objectives: To differentiate between metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer using respiratory-triggered short inversion time inversion recovery (STIR) turbo spin-echo (SE) MR imaging. Methods and patients: One hundred and forty mediastinal lymph nodes were detected in 25 patients with non-small cell lung cancer who underwent respiratory-triggered STIR turbo SE imaging. Ratios of signal intensity of lymph nodes to 0.9% saline phantoms (lymph node-saline ratio) were compared by Student's t-test using the pathological diagnosis as the gold standard. The threshold value of the lymph node-saline ratio was determined for a positive test, and tested for its capability to provide a differential diagnosis. Results: One hundred and forty lymph nodes were diagnosed and classified into two groups: metastatic lymph node (n=21) and non-metastatic lymph node (n=119). The mean lymph node-saline ratio in the non-metastatic lymph node group (0.42±0.01; mean±standard error) was significantly lower than that of the metastatic lymph node group (0.77±0.02, P<0.0001). When 0.6 was adapted as the threshold for a positive test, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for differentiating metastatic lymph node from non-metastatic lymph node per lymph nodes were 100, 96, and 96%, and sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for differentiating metastatic lymph node from non-metastatic lymph node per patients were 100, 75, and 88%, respectively. Conclusions: Both metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer were well differentiated using respiratory-triggered STIR turbo SE imaging.

Keywords:  Lung, MR, Lymph node, STIR, Staging

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0720-048X(02)00271-1

European Journal of Radiology
Volume 44, Issue 3 , Pages 216-224, December 2002