European Journal of Radiology
Volume 44, Issue 3 , Pages 232-238, December 2002

Sclerosing adenosis: mammographic and ultrasonographic findings with clinical and histopathological correlation

  • Işıl Günhan-Bilgen

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University Hospital, Bornova, 35100 İzmir, Turkey
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +90-232-388-1390; fax: +90-232-342-0001
  • ,
  • Ayşenur Memiş

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University Hospital, Bornova, 35100 İzmir, Turkey
  • ,
  • Esin Emin Üstün

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University Hospital, Bornova, 35100 İzmir, Turkey
  • ,
  • Necmettin Özdemir

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pathology, Ege University Hospital, Bornova, 35100 İzmir, Turkey
  • ,
  • Yıldız Erhan

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pathology, Ege University Hospital, Bornova, 35100 İzmir, Turkey

Received 29 November 2001; received in revised form 15 January 2002; accepted 18 January 2002.

Abstract 

Objective: To evaluate the mammographic and ultrasonographic findings of sclerosing adenosis, a relatively uncommon entity which may sometimes mimic carcinoma. Materials and methods: A retrospective review of the records of 33 700 women, who have undergone mammographic examination at our institution between January 1985 and July 2001 revealed 43 histopathologically proven sclerosing adenosis. The history, physical examination, mammographic and ultrasonographic findings were analyzed in all patients. In 30 patients, the nonpalpable lesions were preoperatively localized by the needle–hookwire system under the guidance of mammography (n=22) or ultrasonography (US) (n=8). Radiological features were correlated with histopathological findings. Results: The age of the patients varied between 32 and 55 years (mean, 43.7 years). Only two patients had a family history of breast cancer. In six patients, the presenting complaint was mastalgia. A palpable mass was present in 13 cases. The mammographic findings were; microcalcifications in 24 (55.8%) (clustered in 22, diffuse in two), mass in five (11.6%), asymmetric focal density in three (6.9%), and focal architectural distortion in three (6.9%) patients. Four of the masses were irregularly contoured, while one was well-circumscribed. On US, focal acoustic shadowing without a mass configuration was noted in the three patients who showed asymmetrical focal density on mammography. In eight patients, who showed normal mammograms, a solid mass was detected on US. Two masses had discrete well-circumscribed oval or lobulated contours, while six showed microlobulation and irregularity. In one case, the irregularly contoured mass had marked posterior acoustic shadowing. Two of the three patients, who had focal architectural distortion on mammograms, had an irregularly contoured solid mass, while the third presented as focal acoustic shadowing without a mass configuration. Conclusion: Sclerosing adenosis mostly presents as a nonpalpable lesion with different mammographic and sonographic appearances. The most common finding is microcalcifications on mammograms. Awareness of the possible imaging features will enable us to consider sclerosing adenosis in the differential diagnosis. The radiological features may sometimes mimic malignancy, so histopathologic examination is mandatory for definite diagnosis.

Keywords:  Breast, Sclerosing adenosis, Mammography, Ultrasonography

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0720-048X(02)00020-7

European Journal of Radiology
Volume 44, Issue 3 , Pages 232-238, December 2002