European Journal of Radiology
Volume 44, Issue 1 , Pages 44-47, October 2002

Magnetic resonance imaging for stress incontinence: evaluation of patients before and after surgical correction

  • Hakkı Perk

      Affiliations

    • Urology Department, School of Medicine, Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondng author. Present address: Kurtuluş Mah. 1420 Sokak, 22/3, Isparta, Turkey. Tel.: +90-246-237-1747; fax: +90-246-237-1762
  • ,
  • Baha Oral

      Affiliations

    • Gynecology and Obstetrics Department, School of Medicine, Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey
  • ,
  • Ahmet Yeşildağ

      Affiliations

    • Radiology Department, School of Medicine, Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey
  • ,
  • T.Ahmet Serel

      Affiliations

    • Urology Department, School of Medicine, Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey
  • ,
  • Mesut Özsoy

      Affiliations

    • Gynecology and Obstetrics Department, School of Medicine, Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey
  • ,
  • Tayfun Turgut

      Affiliations

    • Radiology Department, School of Medicine, Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey

Received 18 October 2001; received in revised form 12 November 2001; accepted 15 November 2001.

Abstract 

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the pre and postoperative assessment of stress urinary incontinence. Methods: Fifteen female patients with clinical evidence of stress urinary incontinence were included in this prospective study. All the patients underwent MRI in the supine position both preoperatively and postoperatively. For imaging, we used a 1.0 T magnet, T2-weighted images were obtained in the midline sagittal plane with patients at rest. Images were evaluated for anatomical stress urinary incontinence alterations, such as the increased distance between the pubococcygeal line and the bladder base and the posterior urethro–vesical angle and the urethral inclination angle changes. Wilcoxon signed rank test allowed comparisons of pre and postoperative results. Results: Compared with postoperative measurements, the bladder base was lowered significantly by an average of 9.4±4.0 mm (P<0.01), posterior urethro–vesical angle was significantly increased by an average of 127.8±11.4° (P<0.01), and the urethral inclination angle was significantly increased by an average of 54.9±10.1° (P<0.01) preoperatively. Conclusion: Our results suggest that MRI can play a major role in the preoperative and postoperative assessment of stress urinary incontinence. It can reliably detect anatomical urinary incontinence alterations. MRI should be considered in failed surgery, complex prolapse, and in differentiating genuine stress incontinence resulting from malposition of the bladder neck from stress incontinence due to intrinsic urethral damage.

Keywords:  Urinary incontinence, Magnetic resonance imaging, Pelvic floor, Pelvic organs

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0720-048X(01)00472-7

European Journal of Radiology
Volume 44, Issue 1 , Pages 44-47, October 2002