European Journal of Radiology
Volume 41, Issue 3 , Pages 217-221, March 2002

Ultrasonic contrast agents: safety considerations reviewed

  • G.R. ter Haar

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationTel.: +44-20-8661-3703; fax: +44-20-8643-3812

Joint Physics Department, Institute of Cancer Research, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, UK

Received 15 October 2001; received in revised form 17 October 2001; accepted 18 October 2001.

Abstract 

Ultrasonic contrast agents are usually comprised of a stabilised shell encapsulating a gas bubble. When these are introduced in the body they increase the acoustic scattering from the tissues through which they pass, and especially from the vasculature. Their primary uses lie in cardiological and oncological imaging. However, these microbubbles have the potential to act as centres for acoustic cavitation activity, and so it is important to consider the safety of their use from an acoustic standpoint. The addition of ultrasonic contrast agents to in vitro suspensions of red blood cells has been shown to lead to haemolysis when the sample is exposed to ultrasound at levels which leave the cells unharmed in their absence. In vivo the infusion of gas bubble contrast agents into experimental animals has been shown to enhance the incidence of petechiae and haemorrhage in the intestine. The Mechanical Index (MI) thresholds for the effects seen in vitro lie within the range of MIs available with diagnostic clinical scanners, but in vivo the thresholds lie at the top end of the exposure levels available clinically. No adverse effects in humans arising from the ultrasonic exposure of these contrast agents have been reported to date.

Keywords: Diagnostic ultrasound safety, Ultrasound contrast agents, Microbubbles, Acoustic cavitation, Sonoporation, Haemolysis, Petechiae

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0720-048X(01)00456-9

European Journal of Radiology
Volume 41, Issue 3 , Pages 217-221, March 2002