European Journal of Radiology
Volume 39, Issue 1 , Pages 16-21, July 2001

Endoluminal repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms — state of the art

  • James May

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, University of Sydney DO6, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +61-2-93513358; fax: +61-2-93517075
  • ,
  • Geoffrey H. White

      Affiliations

    • Department of Vascular Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
  • ,
  • John P. Harris

      Affiliations

    • Department of Vascular Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia

Received 16 October 2000; accepted 16 November 2000.

Abstract 

This paper considers the historical aspects of endovascular aneursym repair; the major findings of our Departments experience over an 8-year period and reviews recent developments in endovascular prostheses. Analysis of 400 patients undergoing primary repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm between 1992 and 2000 revealed a perioperative mortality rate of 2.7% and primary conversion rate of 5%. With sequential studies it was shown that the outcome was better with bifurcated/aorto uni iliac grafts than tube grafts; better with second generation prostheses than first generation protheses and that survival in consecutive patients treated concurrently by open repair and endoluminal repair was superior in the endoluminal group. Endoluminal AAA repair is at a critical point of its development. It is unquestioned that it can dramatically reduce the need for intensive care and length of hospital stay and more recently it has been reported that survival is improved compared with open repair. The need for lifetime surveillance, the probability of graft failure and need for re-intervention, however, negate some of the advantages. The small incidence of unpredictable rupture following endoluminal AAA repair is a timely reminder of the need for continued careful follow-up.

Keywords: Aortic aneurysm, Endovascular, Endoluminal repair

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0720-048X(01)00338-2

European Journal of Radiology
Volume 39, Issue 1 , Pages 16-21, July 2001