European Journal of Radiology
Volume 39, Issue 3 , Pages 194-200, September 2001

Intraureteral metallic endoprosthesis in the treatment of ureteral strictures

  • George Daskalopoulos

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, General University Hospital of Heraklion, 71110 Heraklion, Crete, Greece
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +30-81-39233840; fax: +30-81-542066
  • ,
  • Adam Hatzidakis

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, General University Hospital, Heraklion, Greece
  • ,
  • Theodosis Triantafyllou

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, General University Hospital of Heraklion, 71110 Heraklion, Crete, Greece
  • ,
  • Dimitrios Delakas

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, General University Hospital of Heraklion, 71110 Heraklion, Crete, Greece
  • ,
  • Ploutarchos Anezinis

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, General University Hospital of Heraklion, 71110 Heraklion, Crete, Greece
  • ,
  • Maria Metaxari

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, General University Hospital of Heraklion, 71110 Heraklion, Crete, Greece
  • ,
  • Angelos Cranidis

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, General University Hospital of Heraklion, 71110 Heraklion, Crete, Greece

Received 2 March 2001; received in revised form 23 March 2001; accepted 26 March 2001.

Abstract 

Objective: We report our experience on intraureteral metallic stents placement for the treatment of malignant and benign ureteral strictures. Methods: Eight patients (six men and two women) with inoperable malignant or benign ureteral strictures, underwent insertion of metallic stents through percutaneous tracts. Six lesions (three malignant, three benign) involved ureterointestinal anastomoses after cystectomy for bladder cancer and ureteroileal urinary diversion or bladder substitution, and two malignant lesions involved the midureter. Self-expandable stents were used in seven cases and a balloon-expandable stent in the remaining one case. One stent was sufficient in seven ureters, and in one ureter, two overlapping stents were placed. Results: Metallic stents were inserted without technical difficulties in all obstructed ureters and patency was achieved in all patients. Ultrasonography revealed resolution of pre-existing hydronephrosis. The duration of follow-up was 6–17 months (mean, 9 months). One ureter was occluded 8 months after stent placement because of ingrowth of tumor and granulation tissue. The other ureters showed no signs of obstruction during follow-up. No major complications directly attributable to the metallic stent occurred. Conclusions: Our results suggest that insertion of a metallic stent in the ureter is feasible and safe for the treatment of benign or malignant ureteral strictures. However, more work needs to be done to establish the use of these stents for the treatment of ureteral obstruction.

Keywords:  Metallic stent, Ureteral obstruction, Malignancy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0720-048X(01)00331-X

European Journal of Radiology
Volume 39, Issue 3 , Pages 194-200, September 2001