Breast compression and radiation dose in two different mammographic oblique projections: 45 and 60°

References 

1. Shapiro S, Strax P, Venet P. Periodic breast cancer screening in reducing mortality from breast cancer. JAMA. 1971;215:1777–1785
   • MEDLINE
2. Bassett LW, Gold RH. Breast radiography using the oblique projection. Radiology. 1983;149:585–587
   • MEDLINE
3. Eklund GW, Cardenosa G. The art of mammographic positioning. Radiol. Clin. North Am. 1992;30:21–53
   • MEDLINE
4. Lundgren B. The oblique view at mammography. Br. J. Radiol. 1976;50:626–628
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
5. Lester RG. Risk versus benefit in mammography. Radiology. 1977;124:1–6
   • MEDLINE
6. Feig SA. Radiation risk from mammography: is it clinically significant?. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 1984;143:469–475
   • MEDLINE
7. Dance DR. Monte Carlo calculation of conversion factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose. Phys. Med. Biol. 1990;35:1211–1219
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
8. Haus AG. Physical principles and radiation dose in mammography. In:  Feig SA,  McLelland D editor. Breast carcinoma: current diagnosis and treatment. New York: Masson Publishing and American College of Radiology; 1983;p. 34
9. Young KC, Ramsdale ML, Rust A. Mammographic dose and image quality in the UK breast screening programme. NHS Breast Screening Programme; Sheffield NHSBSP Publication 1995;35:1–8.
10. Tanner RL. Mammographic unit compression force: Acceptance test and quality control protocols. Radiology. 1992;184:45–48
    • MEDLINE
11. Yaffe MJ, Hendrick RE, Feig SA, Rothenberg LN, Och J, Gagne R. Recomended specifications for new mammography equipment: Report of the ACR-CDC Focus group on mammography equipment. Radiology. 1995;197:19–26
    • MEDLINE
12. Eklund GW. Mammographic compression: science or art. Radiology. 1991;181:339–341
    • MEDLINE
13. Peppercorn PD, Horrocks J, Keene M, Kenyon G, Martin A, Riznek RH. The effect of decreasing mAs on image quality and patient dose in CT scans of the paranasal sinuses. ECR Book of Abstracts, 1997, p. 88.
14. Aichinger H, Dierker J, Säbel M, Joite-Barfuß A. Bildqualität und Dosis in der Mammographie. Electromedica. 1994;62:7–11
15. Sullivan DC, Beam CA, Goodman SM, Watt DL. Measurement of force applied during mammography. Radiology. 1991;181:355–357
    • MEDLINE
16. Working Party of the Diagnostic Radiology Topic Group. Report No. 59: The commissioning and routine testing of mammographic X-ray systems. York, UK: Institute of Physical Sciences in Medicine, 1989, p. 9.
17. American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Report No. 29: Equipment requirements and quality control for mammography. New York: American Institute of Physics, 1990, p. 47.